2-166199716-A-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):c.4923T>C(p.Leu1641Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000567 in 1,614,124 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L1641L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00043 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00058 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SCN9A
NM_001365536.1 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.17

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SCN9A (HGNC:10597): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9) This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel which plays a significant role in nociception signaling. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary erythermalgia, channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain, and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]

SCN9A links:

SCN1A-AS1 (HGNC:54069): (SCN1A and SCN9A antisense RNA 1)

SCN1A-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).

BP6

Variant 2-166199716-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166199716-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 130272.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.17 with no splicing effect.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001365536.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
SCN9A	NM_001365536.1	MANE Select	c.4923T>C	p.Leu1641Leu	synonymous	Exon 27 of 27	NP_001352465.1
SCN9A	NM_002977.4		c.4890T>C	p.Leu1630Leu	synonymous	Exon 27 of 27	NP_002968.2
SCN1A-AS1	NR_110260.1		n.509A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 4 of 12

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
SCN9A	ENST00000642356.2	MANE Select	c.4923T>C	p.Leu1641Leu	synonymous	Exon 27 of 27	ENSP00000495601.1
SCN9A	ENST00000303354.11	TSL:5	c.4923T>C	p.Leu1641Leu	synonymous	Exon 27 of 27	ENSP00000304748.7
SCN9A	ENST00000409672.5	TSL:5	c.4890T>C	p.Leu1630Leu	synonymous	Exon 27 of 27	ENSP00000386306.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000427

AC:

AN:

152116

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000290

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000942

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000706

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000955

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000322

AC:

AN:

251484

AF XY:

0.000331

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000650

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000582

AC:

851

AN:

1461890

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000590

AC XY:

429

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000209

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000224

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000562

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000721

AC:

802

AN:

1112008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000480

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.476

Heterozygous variant carriers

118

177

236

295

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

128

160

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000427

AC:

AN:

152234

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000309

AC XY:

AN XY:

74432

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

41534

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5160

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4816

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000942

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000706

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000945

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.487

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000603

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000416

EpiCase

AF:

0.000491

EpiControl

AF:

0.000830

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

May 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

SCN9A: BP4, BP7

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified

Benign:2

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed.

Aug 05, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Channelopathy-associated congenital insensitivity to pain, autosomal recessive

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Primary erythromelalgia

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Jul 11, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 7;C2752089:Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.81

CADD

Benign

0.56

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.55

PhyloP100

-1.2

Mutation Taster

=95/5

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over