2-166251875-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):​c.3362G>A​(p.Arg1121Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0191 in 1,611,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 374 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1121W) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.022 ( 51 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.019 ( 323 hom. )

Consequence

SCN9A
NM_001365536.1 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.86

Publications

13 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN9A (HGNC:10597): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9) This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel which plays a significant role in nociception signaling. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary erythermalgia, channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain, and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
SCN1A-AS1 (HGNC:54069): (SCN1A and SCN9A antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.002156794).
BP6
Variant 2-166251875-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166251875-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 130262.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0219 (3332/151996) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0278 (134/4814). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0249. There are 51 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1752 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 51 AD,SD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SCN9ANM_001365536.1 linkc.3362G>A p.Arg1121Gln missense_variant Exon 18 of 27 ENST00000642356.2 NP_001352465.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN9AENST00000642356.2 linkc.3362G>A p.Arg1121Gln missense_variant Exon 18 of 27 NM_001365536.1 ENSP00000495601.1 Q15858-1
SCN9AENST00000303354.11 linkc.3362G>A p.Arg1121Gln missense_variant Exon 18 of 27 5 ENSP00000304748.7 Q15858-1
SCN9AENST00000409672.5 linkc.3329G>A p.Arg1110Gln missense_variant Exon 18 of 27 5 ENSP00000386306.1 Q15858-3
SCN9AENST00000645907.1 linkc.3329G>A p.Arg1110Gln missense_variant Exon 18 of 27 ENSP00000495983.1 Q15858-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0219
AC:
3329
AN:
151878
Hom.:
51
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0262
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0147
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0274
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0419
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0204
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0187
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0204
AC:
5064
AN:
247896
AF XY:
0.0218
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0278
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00866
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0148
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000224
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0385
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0214
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0178
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0188
AC:
27471
AN:
1459990
Hom.:
323
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0193
AC XY:
13983
AN XY:
726258
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0289
AC:
965
AN:
33394
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00898
AC:
400
AN:
44548
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0149
AC:
388
AN:
26080
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000227
AC:
9
AN:
39612
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0283
AC:
2442
AN:
86178
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0346
AC:
1846
AN:
53336
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0344
AC:
198
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0182
AC:
20239
AN:
1110836
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0163
AC:
984
AN:
60246
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1242
2484
3727
4969
6211
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
738
1476
2214
2952
3690
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0219
AC:
3332
AN:
151996
Hom.:
51
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0236
AC XY:
1752
AN XY:
74278
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0261
AC:
1085
AN:
41492
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0106
AC:
161
AN:
15218
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0147
AC:
51
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00116
AC:
6
AN:
5152
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0278
AC:
134
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0419
AC:
444
AN:
10586
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0137
AC:
4
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0204
AC:
1388
AN:
67950
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0185
AC:
39
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
173
346
519
692
865
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
44
88
132
176
220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0192
Hom.:
67
Bravo
AF:
0.0196
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0167
AC:
62
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0153
AC:
59
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0326
AC:
123
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0195
AC:
160
ExAC
AF:
0.0202
AC:
2441
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0110
AC:
39
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0177
EpiControl
AF:
0.0188

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Nov 04, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 21, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Primary erythromelalgia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Channelopathy-associated congenital insensitivity to pain, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 7;C2752089:Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Small fiber neuropathy Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.071
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
1.3
DANN
Benign
0.60
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.17
.;T;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.8
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.8
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.047
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.51
T;.;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0022
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.35
.;N;.;.;N;N
PhyloP100
-3.9
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.88
N;.;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.12
Sift
Benign
0.58
T;.;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.78
T;T;.;.;.;T
Vest4
0.15
MPC
0.14
ClinPred
0.0019
T
GERP RS
-2.9
Varity_R
0.025
gMVP
0.25
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.15
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs74401238; hg19: chr2-167108385; API