2-166278265-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):​c.2392A>G​(p.Met798Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000844 in 1,611,782 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 24 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M798L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00095 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00083 ( 22 hom. )

Consequence

SCN9A
NM_001365536.1 missense

Scores

8
9

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.64

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN9A (HGNC:10597): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9) This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel which plays a significant role in nociception signaling. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary erythermalgia, channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain, and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
SCN1A-AS1 (HGNC:54069): (SCN1A and SCN9A antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011496514).
BP6
Variant 2-166278265-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166278265-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 194498.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000952 (145/152252) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0236 (122/5180). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0202. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 90 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,SD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SCN9ANM_001365536.1 linkc.2392A>G p.Met798Val missense_variant Exon 15 of 27 ENST00000642356.2 NP_001352465.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN9AENST00000642356.2 linkc.2392A>G p.Met798Val missense_variant Exon 15 of 27 NM_001365536.1 ENSP00000495601.1
SCN9AENST00000303354.11 linkc.2392A>G p.Met798Val missense_variant Exon 15 of 27 5 ENSP00000304748.7
SCN9AENST00000409672.5 linkc.2359A>G p.Met787Val missense_variant Exon 15 of 27 5 ENSP00000386306.1
SCN9AENST00000645907.1 linkc.2359A>G p.Met787Val missense_variant Exon 15 of 27 ENSP00000495983.1
SCN9AENST00000454569.6 linkc.2359A>G p.Met787Val missense_variant Exon 15 of 15 1 ENSP00000413212.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000940
AC:
143
AN:
152134
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0235
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00331
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00192
AC:
472
AN:
246042
AF XY:
0.00181
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000900
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0233
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000716
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00117
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000832
AC:
1215
AN:
1459530
Hom.:
22
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000817
AC XY:
593
AN XY:
725986
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33386
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000225
AC:
1
AN:
44464
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000537
AC:
14
AN:
26086
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0253
AC:
1000
AN:
39540
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00109
AC:
94
AN:
85894
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000377
AC:
2
AN:
53114
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
1
AN:
5758
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000207
AC:
23
AN:
1110976
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00133
AC:
80
AN:
60312
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
69
138
206
275
344
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000952
AC:
145
AN:
152252
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00121
AC XY:
90
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15270
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000576
AC:
2
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0236
AC:
122
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00373
AC:
18
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
3
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7
13
20
26
33
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000972
Hom.:
6
Bravo
AF:
0.00104
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000120
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00191
AC:
231
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0110
AC:
38
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 19, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:2
Nov 18, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29924869)

Jun 05, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Primary erythromelalgia Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Inherited Erythromelalgia Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Channelopathy-associated congenital insensitivity to pain, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A Benign:1
Mar 26, 2019
Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was classified as: Benign. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: BS1,BS2.

Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 7;C2752089:Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A Benign:1
Jan 08, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.25
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.13
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.060
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0
.;D;.;.;D;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
0.0058
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.093
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.94
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.74
T;.;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.70
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
.;L;.;.;L;L;.;.
PhyloP100
2.6
PrimateAI
Benign
0.46
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.7
D;.;.;.;.;D;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.61
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;.;.;.;.;D;.;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0040
D;D;.;.;.;D;.;.
Vest4
0.55
ClinPred
0.062
T
GERP RS
4.0
PromoterAI
0.0056
Neutral
Varity_R
0.67
gMVP
0.53
Mutation Taster
=67/33
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.12
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149707354; hg19: chr2-167134775; COSMIC: COSV57600616; API