2-169235994-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PP3_Strong
The NM_004525.3(LRP2):c.4766G>A(p.Arg1589His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000039 in 1,614,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004525.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Donnai-Barrow syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
- Stickler syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- intellectual disabilityInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRP2 | NM_004525.3 | c.4766G>A | p.Arg1589His | missense_variant | Exon 29 of 79 | ENST00000649046.1 | NP_004516.2 | |
LRP2 | XM_011511183.4 | c.4766G>A | p.Arg1589His | missense_variant | Exon 29 of 78 | XP_011509485.1 | ||
LRP2 | XM_047444340.1 | c.3842G>A | p.Arg1281His | missense_variant | Exon 29 of 79 | XP_047300296.1 | ||
LRP2 | XM_011511184.3 | c.2477G>A | p.Arg826His | missense_variant | Exon 14 of 64 | XP_011509486.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000557 AC: 14AN: 251324 AF XY: 0.0000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000390 AC: 57AN: 1461880Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000509 AC XY: 37AN XY: 727240 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152300Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74472 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Donnai-Barrow syndrome Uncertain:3
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
- -
not provided Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 1589 of the LRP2 protein (p.Arg1589His). This variant is present in population databases (rs587780385, gnomAD 0.01%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with LRP2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 129525). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt LRP2 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at