2-169289050-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 3P and 2B. PM2PP2BP4_Moderate
The NM_004525.3(LRP2):āc.1018C>Gā(p.His340Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000821 in 1,461,798 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004525.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRP2 | NM_004525.3 | c.1018C>G | p.His340Asp | missense_variant | 9/79 | ENST00000649046.1 | NP_004516.2 | |
LRP2 | XM_011511183.4 | c.1018C>G | p.His340Asp | missense_variant | 9/78 | XP_011509485.1 | ||
LRP2 | XM_047444340.1 | c.94C>G | p.His32Asp | missense_variant | 9/79 | XP_047300296.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRP2 | ENST00000649046.1 | c.1018C>G | p.His340Asp | missense_variant | 9/79 | NM_004525.3 | ENSP00000496870 | P1 | ||
LRP2 | ENST00000443831.1 | c.1018C>G | p.His340Asp | missense_variant | 9/23 | 2 | ENSP00000409813 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251374Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135858
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000821 AC: 12AN: 1461798Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8AN XY: 727210
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 18, 2014 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at