2-174747658-C-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong

The NM_000079.4(CHRNA1):c.*466G>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000404 in 173,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHRNA1
NM_000079.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.07

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CHRNA1 (HGNC:1955): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 1 subunit) The muscle acetylcholine receptor consiststs of 5 subunits of 4 different types: 2 alpha subunits and 1 each of the beta, gamma, and delta subunits. This gene encodes an alpha subunit that plays a role in acetlycholine binding/channel gating. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2012]

CHRNA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

congenital myasthenic syndrome 1A
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
lethal multiple pterygium syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P
myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 1B, fast-channel
Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CHRNA1 links:

ENSG00000236449 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000236449 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHRNA1	NM_000079.4 link	c.*466G>C	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 9 of 9	ENST00000348749.9	NP_000070.1	P02708-2Q53SH4
CHRNA1	NM_001039523.3 link	c.*466G>C	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 10 of 10		NP_001034612.1	P02708-1Q53SH4
CHRNA1	XM_017003256.2 link	c.*466G>C	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 9 of 9		XP_016858745.1
CHRNA1	XM_017003257.2 link	c.*466G>C	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 8 of 8		XP_016858746.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CHRNA1	ENST00000348749.9 link	c.*466G>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 9 of 9	1	NM_000079.4	ENSP00000261008.5		P02708-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152148

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000142

AC:

AN:

21136

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

10942

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

236

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2758

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

330

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1460

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2688

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

702

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000167

AC:

AN:

11954

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00103

AC:

AN:

972

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0.0183214), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.342

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152266

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74446

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41546

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15290

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10606

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68018

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.600

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Lethal multiple pterygium syndrome

Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Congenital myasthenic syndrome

Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.88

CADD

Benign

0.25

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.61

PhyloP100

-1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over