2-174754215-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000079.4(CHRNA1):​c.540+4G>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00315 in 1,613,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 139 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.018 ( 80 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 59 hom. )

Consequence

CHRNA1
NM_000079.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0002831
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0880

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHRNA1 (HGNC:1955): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 1 subunit) The muscle acetylcholine receptor consiststs of 5 subunits of 4 different types: 2 alpha subunits and 1 each of the beta, gamma, and delta subunits. This gene encodes an alpha subunit that plays a role in acetlycholine binding/channel gating. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2012]
CHRNA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • congenital myasthenic syndrome 1A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • lethal multiple pterygium syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P
  • myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 1B, fast-channel
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
  • postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
BP6
Variant 2-174754215-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-174754215-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 128734.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0588 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CHRNA1NM_000079.4 linkc.540+4G>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 5 of 8 ENST00000348749.9 NP_000070.1 P02708-2Q53SH4
CHRNA1NM_001039523.3 linkc.615+4G>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 6 of 9 NP_001034612.1 P02708-1Q53SH4
CHRNA1XM_017003256.2 linkc.636+4G>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 5 of 8 XP_016858745.1
CHRNA1XM_017003257.2 linkc.561+4G>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 7 XP_016858746.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHRNA1ENST00000348749.9 linkc.540+4G>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 5 of 8 1 NM_000079.4 ENSP00000261008.5 P02708-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0175
AC:
2670
AN:
152208
Hom.:
80
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0608
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00693
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0153
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00433
AC:
1088
AN:
251258
AF XY:
0.00303
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0602
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00237
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000616
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00245
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00164
AC:
2398
AN:
1460696
Hom.:
59
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00144
AC XY:
1050
AN XY:
726662
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0586
AC:
1959
AN:
33448
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00313
AC:
140
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000151
AC:
13
AN:
86206
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53388
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00161
AC:
8
AN:
4984
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000333
AC:
37
AN:
1111848
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00400
AC:
241
AN:
60274
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
125
249
374
498
623
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
62
124
186
248
310
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0176
AC:
2677
AN:
152326
Hom.:
80
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0170
AC XY:
1266
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0608
AC:
2526
AN:
41574
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00693
AC:
106
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000162
AC:
11
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0152
AC:
32
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
136
272
407
543
679
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
32
64
96
128
160
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00207
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.0203
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00404
AC:
14
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Jul 25, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Oct 26, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lethal multiple pterygium syndrome Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Congenital myasthenic syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.68
PhyloP100
0.088
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00028
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.056
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs112674580; hg19: chr2-175618943; API