2-178545555-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.95555T>C​(p.Leu31852Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0151 in 1,613,736 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 227 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L31852L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 20 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.016 ( 207 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

2
4
11

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:27

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.59

Publications

16 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00678429).
BP6
Variant 2-178545555-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178545555-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47559.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0112 (1704/152256) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0173 (1174/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0164. There are 20 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 772 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 20 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.95555T>C p.Leu31852Pro missense_variant Exon 344 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.95555T>C p.Leu31852Pro missense_variant Exon 344 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0112
AC:
1706
AN:
152138
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0396
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0113
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0173
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0148
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0109
AC:
2720
AN:
249012
AF XY:
0.0111
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00252
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00539
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00875
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0174
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0154
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0155
AC:
22675
AN:
1461480
Hom.:
207
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0151
AC XY:
10978
AN XY:
727018
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00251
AC:
84
AN:
33466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00702
AC:
314
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00934
AC:
244
AN:
26126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
2
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00285
AC:
246
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0130
AC:
696
AN:
53402
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0144
AC:
83
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0180
AC:
20065
AN:
1111698
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0156
AC:
941
AN:
60360
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1378
2757
4135
5514
6892
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
754
1508
2262
3016
3770
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0112
AC:
1704
AN:
152256
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0104
AC XY:
772
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00313
AC:
130
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0112
AC:
172
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0118
AC:
41
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00208
AC:
10
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0104
AC:
110
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0173
AC:
1174
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0147
AC:
31
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
96
192
287
383
479
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0150
Hom.:
71
Bravo
AF:
0.0116
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0191
AC:
71
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0213
AC:
82
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00324
AC:
13
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0159
AC:
133
ExAC
AF:
0.0102
AC:
1239
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0177
EpiControl
AF:
0.0188

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:27
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 03, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 22, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Leu29284Pro in exon 293 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 1.4% (104/6772) of European America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs62621206).

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 18, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:6
Nov 22, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TTN: BS1, BS2

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 24, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
May 16, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 08, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.29
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.29
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0
.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.30
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.34
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.83
T;T;T;.;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0068
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
.;.;.;L;.;.;L
PhyloP100
3.6
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.50
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.4
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.20
Sift
Benign
0.14
T;T;.;.;T;T;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.55
ClinPred
0.042
T
GERP RS
4.7
Mutation Taster
=89/11
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs62621206; hg19: chr2-179410282; COSMIC: COSV60066151; COSMIC: COSV60066151; API