2-178549591-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.92131G>A​(p.Val30711Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0589 in 1,612,856 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,393 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.11 ( 1791 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.053 ( 4602 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

7
9

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.919

Publications

28 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0014583766).
BP6
Variant 2-178549591-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178549591-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47519.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.252 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.92131G>A p.Val30711Met missense_variant Exon 338 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.92131G>A p.Val30711Met missense_variant Exon 338 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.114
AC:
17373
AN:
152104
Hom.:
1768
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.255
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0493
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.175
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0360
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0245
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.178
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0588
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0886
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0315
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0900
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0928
AC:
22905
AN:
246802
AF XY:
0.0882
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.259
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.207
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0354
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0275
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0577
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0334
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0686
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0531
AC:
77583
AN:
1460634
Hom.:
4602
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0551
AC XY:
40042
AN XY:
726434
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.268
AC:
8981
AN:
33456
American (AMR)
AF:
0.204
AC:
9119
AN:
44704
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0363
AC:
948
AN:
26114
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0138
AC:
547
AN:
39672
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.174
AC:
14996
AN:
86206
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0589
AC:
3142
AN:
53378
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0578
AC:
333
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0320
AC:
35546
AN:
1111010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0658
AC:
3971
AN:
60334
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4006
8012
12019
16025
20031
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1686
3372
5058
6744
8430
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.115
AC:
17448
AN:
152222
Hom.:
1791
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.120
AC XY:
8900
AN XY:
74430
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.256
AC:
10632
AN:
41490
American (AMR)
AF:
0.176
AC:
2687
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0360
AC:
125
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0247
AC:
128
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.177
AC:
853
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0588
AC:
624
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0850
AC:
25
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0315
AC:
2141
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0891
AC:
188
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
721
1442
2162
2883
3604
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
178
356
534
712
890
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0554
Hom.:
2739
Bravo
AF:
0.127
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0297
AC:
110
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0288
AC:
111
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.261
AC:
971
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0308
AC:
252
ExAC
AF:
0.0902
AC:
10896
Asia WGS
AF:
0.128
AC:
445
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.0314
EpiControl
AF:
0.0325

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Sep 03, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 18, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 27, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 26, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BA1 -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 16, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.17
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.94
Eigen
Uncertain
0.55
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.57
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.86
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.95
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0015
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.3
.;.;.;M;.;.;M
PhyloP100
0.92
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.53
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.1
N;N;.;.;N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.23
Sift
Uncertain
0.0040
D;T;.;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.97
.;.;.;D;.;.;D
Vest4
0.21
MPC
0.29
ClinPred
0.026
T
GERP RS
5.7
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs747122; hg19: chr2-179414318; COSMIC: COSV59942992; COSMIC: COSV59942992; API