2-178564885-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):āc.81247T>Cā(p.Ser27083Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000416 in 1,612,456 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S27083S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.81247T>C | p.Ser27083Pro | missense_variant | 326/363 | ENST00000589042.5 | |
TTN-AS1 | NR_038272.1 | n.2044-17687A>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.81247T>C | p.Ser27083Pro | missense_variant | 326/363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | P1 | |
TTN-AS1 | ENST00000659121.1 | n.417-32711A>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000986 AC: 150AN: 152128Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000255 AC: 63AN: 246674Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000262 AC XY: 35AN XY: 133792
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000356 AC: 520AN: 1460210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.000372 AC XY: 270AN XY: 726318
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000985 AC: 150AN: 152246Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000846 AC XY: 63AN XY: 74434
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Dec 13, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | TTN: BP4 - |
not provided, no classification provided | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 06, 2013 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 09, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 05, 2020 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 18, 2015 | The p.Ser24515Pro variant in TTN has not been previously reported in individuals with cardiomyopathy, but has been identified in 0.04% (30/66212) of European ch romosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute. org; dbSNP rs186273940). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysi s do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summ ary, the clinical significance of the p.Ser24515Pro variant is uncertain. - |
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 04, 2017 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 09, 2013 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at