2-178576311-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.69821G>A​(p.Gly23274Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00131 in 1,575,634 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

7
5
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.86
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06508699).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00105 (160/152146) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00191 (130/67986). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00164. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 76 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.69821G>A p.Gly23274Asp missense_variant Exon 326 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.69821G>A p.Gly23274Asp missense_variant Exon 326 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00105
AC:
160
AN:
152028
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000524
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000866
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00118
AC:
249
AN:
210944
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00125
AC XY:
143
AN XY:
113946
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000204
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000503
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000429
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000454
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000967
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00208
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000812
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00133
AC:
1899
AN:
1423488
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.00140
AC XY:
988
AN XY:
705252
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000126
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000612
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000592
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000165
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000928
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00158
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00106
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00105
AC:
160
AN:
152146
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00102
AC XY:
76
AN XY:
74360
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000866
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000475
Alfa
AF:
0.00186
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00100
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00162
AC:
6
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00230
AC:
19
ExAC
AF:
0.000985
AC:
119
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:9
Aug 13, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 21, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 15, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

TTN: BP5, BS2 -

Nov 04, 2020
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24503780, 23861362, 23396983, 32403337) -

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Nov 19, 2022
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 25, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The Gly20706Asp var iant in TTN has been identified by our laboratory in 1 Caucasian adult with DCM and LBBB and 1 Caucasian adult with ARVC (Pugh 2014; LMM unpublished data). In a ddition, this variant has been identified in 0.2% (19/8258) of European American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu /EVS/; dbSNP rs201043950). Computational prediction tools and conservation analy sis do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In su mmary, while the clinical significance of the Gly20706Asp variant is uncertain, its frequency suggests that it is more likely to be benign. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Uncertain:1Benign:1
Apr 05, 2018
Baylor Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1Benign:1
Feb 14, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

There is insufficient or conflicting evidence for classification of this alteration. -

Jul 17, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Brugada syndrome Uncertain:1
-
Genetics and Genomics Program, Sidra Medicine
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

The c.69821G>A missense variant in TTN is reported in gnomAD with a frequency of 0.0014 (PM2). It represents a novel missense change in a gene where other missense changes have been pathogenic (PM5). ACMG codes: PM5, PM2. -

TTN-related disorder Benign:1
Jun 23, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 31, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jun 25, 2019
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.91
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.11
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.060
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.72
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.86
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.78
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.97
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.027
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.065
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.013
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.3
.;.;.;M;.;.;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.72
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.2
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.60
Sift
Uncertain
0.010
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.;.;D
Vest4
0.56
MVP
0.45
MPC
0.53
ClinPred
0.088
T
GERP RS
5.9

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201043950; hg19: chr2-179441038; COSMIC: COSV99045470; COSMIC: COSV99045470; API