2-178581917-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP2BP4_Strong
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.66452G>A(p.Arg22151Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,612,940 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.66452G>A | p.Arg22151Gln | missense_variant | 315/363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 | |
TTN-AS1 | NR_038272.1 | n.2044-655C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.66452G>A | p.Arg22151Gln | missense_variant | 315/363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141 | P1 | |
TTN-AS1 | ENST00000659121.1 | n.417-15679C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152082Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000403 AC: 1AN: 248084Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000743 AC XY: 1AN XY: 134664
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000411 AC: 6AN: 1460858Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 726698
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152082Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74272
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
TTN-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 12, 2024 | The TTN c.66452G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg22151Gln. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.00089% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 28, 2023 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 22151 of the TTN protein (p.Arg22151Gln). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.0009%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TTN-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 535007). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Not Available"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The glutamine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. This variant is located in the A band of TTN (PMID: 25589632). Variants in this region may be relevant for cardiac or neuromuscular disorders (PMID: 25589632, 23975875). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Dec 18, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at