2-178583666-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.65516C>T​(p.Ala21839Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0025 in 1,612,100 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 72 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A21839T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 35 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 37 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

1
5
10

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.86

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0041813552).
BP6
Variant 2-178583666-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178583666-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47223.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0123 (1865/152116) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0416 (1729/41528). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.04. There are 35 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 878 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 35 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.65516C>T p.Ala21839Val missense_variant Exon 312 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.65516C>T p.Ala21839Val missense_variant Exon 312 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0123
AC:
1862
AN:
151998
Hom.:
35
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0417
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00538
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0101
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00349
AC:
863
AN:
247112
AF XY:
0.00258
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0443
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00286
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00180
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000466
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000464
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00218
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00148
AC:
2159
AN:
1459984
Hom.:
37
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00128
AC XY:
927
AN XY:
726190
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0455
AC:
1521
AN:
33418
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00302
AC:
135
AN:
44630
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00157
AC:
41
AN:
26074
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39448
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000465
AC:
4
AN:
86026
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53320
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00350
AC:
20
AN:
5720
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000238
AC:
264
AN:
1111072
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00289
AC:
174
AN:
60276
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
103
206
310
413
516
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
54
108
162
216
270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0123
AC:
1865
AN:
152116
Hom.:
35
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0118
AC XY:
878
AN XY:
74362
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0416
AC:
1729
AN:
41528
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00537
AC:
82
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5128
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000397
AC:
27
AN:
67984
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00995
AC:
21
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
85
171
256
342
427
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00508
Hom.:
19
Bravo
AF:
0.0146
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0426
AC:
161
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000365
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.00402
AC:
485
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:25
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 30, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 31, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 09, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 09, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ala19271Val in exon 261 of TTN: This variant is classified as benign based on it s high frequency in the general population (dbSNP rs55948748; NHLBI Exome Sequen cing Project, http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS). -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Oct 02, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Dec 12, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1838244:Tibial muscular dystrophy;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G;C1861065:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9;C1863599:Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure;C2673677:Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Nov 02, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Mar 05, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.31
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.31
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.97
Eigen
Benign
0.15
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.27
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.85
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0042
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.4
.;.;.;M;.;.;M
PhyloP100
6.9
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.63
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.2
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.12
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
Polyphen
0.16
.;.;.;B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.49
MVP
0.46
MPC
0.094
ClinPred
0.030
T
GERP RS
5.1
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55948748; hg19: chr2-179448393; API