2-178584852-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.64789G>A​(p.Val21597Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00219 in 1,613,342 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 52 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V21597A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 47 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

4
7
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:22

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.34

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008097768).
BP6
Variant 2-178584852-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178584852-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 47213.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00179 (272/152122) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.024 (116/4832). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0205. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 151 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.64789G>A p.Val21597Met missense_variant Exon 310 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.64789G>A p.Val21597Met missense_variant Exon 310 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00177
AC:
269
AN:
152004
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00184
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0234
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00163
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00371
AC:
922
AN:
248242
AF XY:
0.00474
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000783
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000897
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000558
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00348
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00223
AC:
3259
AN:
1461220
Hom.:
47
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00285
AC XY:
2071
AN XY:
726904
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000419
AC:
14
AN:
33442
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000693
AC:
31
AN:
44706
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000842
AC:
22
AN:
26116
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000177
AC:
7
AN:
39656
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0210
AC:
1814
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000749
AC:
4
AN:
53392
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00434
AC:
25
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00105
AC:
1163
AN:
1111566
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00297
AC:
179
AN:
60334
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.471
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
246
492
737
983
1229
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
48
96
144
192
240
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00179
AC:
272
AN:
152122
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00203
AC XY:
151
AN XY:
74354
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000241
AC:
10
AN:
41538
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00183
AC:
28
AN:
15266
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000865
AC:
3
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000195
AC:
1
AN:
5136
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0240
AC:
116
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00163
AC:
111
AN:
67956
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
24
36
48
60
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00172
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00105
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00156
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000504
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00192
AC:
16
ExAC
AF:
0.00425
AC:
514
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0130
AC:
46
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00262
EpiControl
AF:
0.00249

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:22
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 25, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Val19029Met in exon 259 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 2.3% (383/16510) of South Asian c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org; dbSNP rs150661999). -

Feb 08, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 06, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 05, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:5
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Mar 17, 2014
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 14, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
May 30, 2019
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Feb 28, 2017
Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 06, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.69
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.32
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.22
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.93
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.87
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0081
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.41
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.1
.;.;.;M;.;.;M
PhyloP100
3.3
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.58
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.2
N;N;.;.;N;N;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.52
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.;.;D
Vest4
0.46
MVP
0.72
MPC
0.46
ClinPred
0.081
T
GERP RS
6.0
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150661999; hg19: chr2-179449579; API