2-178599800-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.56101A>G​(p.Asn18701Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.279 in 1,607,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 75,371 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.36 ( 11911 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.27 ( 63460 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

1
15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:22

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.13

Publications

48 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=1.4161484E-5).
BP6
Variant 2-178599800-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178599800-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47110.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.69 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.56101A>G p.Asn18701Asp missense_variant Exon 289 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.56101A>G p.Asn18701Asp missense_variant Exon 289 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.363
AC:
55096
AN:
151738
Hom.:
11862
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.540
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.559
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.387
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.291
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.709
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.521
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.287
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.282
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.227
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.331
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.355
AC:
86524
AN:
243536
AF XY:
0.352
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.544
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.432
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.290
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.713
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.279
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.228
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.311
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.270
AC:
393045
AN:
1455274
Hom.:
63460
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.275
AC XY:
199194
AN XY:
723532
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.554
AC:
18336
AN:
33082
American (AMR)
AF:
0.429
AC:
18809
AN:
43808
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.288
AC:
7476
AN:
25948
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.701
AC:
27642
AN:
39408
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.510
AC:
43292
AN:
84962
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.279
AC:
14812
AN:
53164
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.317
AC:
1818
AN:
5736
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.219
AC:
242515
AN:
1109068
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.305
AC:
18345
AN:
60098
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13626
27252
40878
54504
68130
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
8946
17892
26838
35784
44730
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.364
AC:
55207
AN:
151856
Hom.:
11911
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.374
AC XY:
27732
AN XY:
74194
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.541
AC:
22404
AN:
41416
American (AMR)
AF:
0.388
AC:
5911
AN:
15252
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.291
AC:
1009
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.709
AC:
3619
AN:
5104
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.519
AC:
2500
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.287
AC:
3037
AN:
10570
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.289
AC:
85
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.227
AC:
15420
AN:
67918
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.339
AC:
713
AN:
2104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1629
3257
4886
6514
8143
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
520
1040
1560
2080
2600
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.283
Hom.:
23052
Bravo
AF:
0.377
TwinsUK
AF:
0.214
AC:
794
ALSPAC
AF:
0.216
AC:
834
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.533
AC:
1980
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.226
AC:
1846
ExAC
AF:
0.353
AC:
42659
Asia WGS
AF:
0.622
AC:
2161
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.223
EpiControl
AF:
0.232

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:22
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Oct 31, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Sep 27, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 18, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 02, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 16, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.052
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.74
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.70
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.93
Eigen
Benign
-0.36
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.11
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.044
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.49
T;T;T;.;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.000014
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.52
.;.;.;N;.;.;N
PhyloP100
6.1
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.57
T
PROVEAN
Benign
2.8
N;N;.;.;N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T;.;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.0
.;.;.;B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.035
MPC
0.095
ClinPred
0.011
T
GERP RS
5.6
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1001238; hg19: chr2-179464527; COSMIC: COSV60287713; COSMIC: COSV60287713; API