2-178601159-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.55745C>T(p.Pro18582Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000667 in 1,528,298 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.55745C>T | p.Pro18582Leu | missense_variant | Exon 288 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.55745C>T | p.Pro18582Leu | missense_variant | Exon 288 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000921 AC: 14AN: 151978Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000826 AC: 15AN: 181508 AF XY: 0.0000413 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000639 AC: 88AN: 1376320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000591 AC XY: 40AN XY: 676358 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000921 AC: 14AN: 151978Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74216 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
- -
- -
- -
not specified Uncertain:2
Missense variants in the TTN gene are considered 'unclassified' if they are not previously reported in the literature and do not have >1% frequency in the population to be considered a polymorphism. Research indicates that truncating mutations in the TTN gene are expected to account for approximately 25% of familial and 18% of sporadic idiopathic DCM; however, truncating variants in the TTN gene have been reported in approximately 3% of reported control alleles. There has been little investigation into non-truncating variants. (Herman D et al. Truncations of titin causing dilated cardiomyopathy. N Eng J Med 366:619-628, 2012) The variant is found in CARDIOMYOPATHY panel(s). -
Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The Pro16014Leu var iant in TTN has not been reported in the literature nor previously identified by our laboratory. This variant has been identified in 2/8184 European American ch romosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:// evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs201194435). Proline (Pro) at position 16014 is not conserved in mammals, as rat carries a leucine (Leu; this variant) at thi s position. Additional computational analyses (biochemical amino acid properties , AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) suggest that this variant may not impact the p rotein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenici ty. Additional information is needed to fully assess the clinical significance o f this variant. -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1S Uncertain:1
- -
TTN-related disorder Uncertain:1
The TTN c.55745C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Pro18582Leu. This variant has been reported in an individual with dilated cardiomyopathy (Table S5, PAtient DCM-06, Klauke et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 29253866). This variant is reported in 0.015% of alleles in individuals of European (non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
- -
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at