2-178605515-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 1P and 1B. PP3BP6
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):āc.53780T>Cā(p.Leu17927Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000161 in 1,612,316 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.53780T>C | p.Leu17927Pro | missense_variant | Exon 279 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 | 
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.53780T>C | p.Leu17927Pro | missense_variant | Exon 279 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  0.0000855  AC: 13AN: 151972Hom.:  0  Cov.: 32 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.000145  AC: 36AN: 248156 AF XY:  0.000141   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.000168  AC: 246AN: 1460344Hom.:  0  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.000175  AC XY: 127AN XY: 726432 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome  0.0000855  AC: 13AN: 151972Hom.:  0  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.0000674  AC XY: 5AN XY: 74196 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided    Uncertain:3 
- -
- -
TTN: PM2 -
not specified    Uncertain:1Benign:2 
Variant summary: TTN c.46076T>C (p.Leu15359Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of four in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00015 in 248156 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in TTN causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy (0.00015 vs 0.00039), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.46076T>C has been reported in the literature in a case of early unexplained sudden death of an individual who was found to have Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy upon autopsy, however, multiple variants in cardiac-related genes were reported and segregation data was not available (Salfati_2019). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Dilated Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 31847883). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 202710). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G    Uncertain:1 
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype    Uncertain:1 
The p.L8862P variant (also known as c.26585T>C), located in coding exon 106 of the TTN gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 26585. The leucine at codon 8862 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at