2-178633323-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.42950G>A(p.Arg14317Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000102 in 1,612,600 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R14317P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.42950G>A | p.Arg14317Gln | missense_variant | Exon 233 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.42950G>A | p.Arg14317Gln | missense_variant | Exon 233 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152020Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000403 AC: 1AN: 247928 AF XY: 0.00000744 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000109 AC: 159AN: 1460580Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000102 AC XY: 74AN XY: 726498 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152020Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000539 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74238 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
- -
The TTN c.42950G>A; p.Arg14317Gln variant (rs727505144; ClinVar Variation ID: 179811) is rare in the general population (<1% allele frequency in the Genome Aggregation Database) and has not been reported in the medical literature in association with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or other TTN-related disease. The clinical relevance of rare missense variants in this gene, which are identified on average once per individual sequenced in affected populations (Herman 2012), is not well understood. Yet, evidence suggests that the vast majority of such missense variants do not contribute to the clinical outcome of DCM (Begay 2015). Thus, the clinical significance of the p.Arg14317Gln variant cannot be determined with certainty. References: Begay RL et al. Role of Titin Missense Variants in Dilated Cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Nov 13;4(11). Herman DS et al. Truncations of titin causing dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 16;366(7):619-28. Linke and Hamdani. Gigantic business: titin properties and function through thick and thin. Circ Res 2014; 114(6): 1052-1068. -
not specified Uncertain:1
The Arg11749Gln variant in TTN has not been previously reported in individuals w ith cardiomyopathy or in large population studies. Computational prediction tool s and conservation analysis do not provide strong support for or against an impa ct to the protein, though 2 mammals (dolphin and killer whale) have a glutamine (Glu) at this position, raising the possibility that this change may be tolerate d. In summary, the clinical significance of the Arg11749Gln variant is uncertain . -
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
The p.R5252Q variant (also known as c.15755G>A), located in coding exon 60 of the TTN gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 15755. The arginine at codon 5252 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at