2-178652500-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.39085C>A(p.Pro13029Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000304 in 1,613,614 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P13029P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001267550.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | NM_001267550.2 | MANE Select | c.39085C>A | p.Pro13029Thr | missense | Exon 202 of 363 | NP_001254479.2 | ||
| TTN | NM_001256850.1 | c.34564C>A | p.Pro11522Thr | missense | Exon 157 of 313 | NP_001243779.1 | |||
| TTN | NM_133378.4 | c.31783C>A | p.Pro10595Thr | missense | Exon 156 of 312 | NP_596869.4 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.39085C>A | p.Pro13029Thr | missense | Exon 202 of 363 | ENSP00000467141.1 | ||
| TTN | ENST00000446966.2 | TSL:1 | c.39085C>A | p.Pro13029Thr | missense | Exon 202 of 361 | ENSP00000408004.2 | ||
| TTN | ENST00000436599.2 | TSL:1 | c.38809C>A | p.Pro12937Thr | missense | Exon 200 of 361 | ENSP00000405517.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152140Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000711 AC: 177AN: 248790 AF XY: 0.000992 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000319 AC: 466AN: 1461356Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000464 AC XY: 337AN XY: 726962 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000164 AC: 25AN: 152258Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000228 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74442 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
p.Pro10595Thr in exon 156 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.6% (101/16512) of South Asian c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org; dbSNP rs397517553).
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
not provided Benign:2
TTN: BP4
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:1
TTN-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1838244:Tibial muscular dystrophy;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G;C1861065:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9;C1863599:Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure;C2673677:Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:1
Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at