2-178685560-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):ā€‹c.32350C>Gā€‹(p.Leu10784Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00144 in 1,613,652 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0043 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0011 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.206
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), TTN. . Gene score misZ -1.1021 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 6.9794 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with dilated cardiomyopathy, tibial muscular dystrophy, early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy, autosomal recessive centronuclear myopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, TTN-related myopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy 1G, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure, familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy, childhood-onset progressive contractures-limb-girdle weakness-muscle dystrophy syndrome, autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0038782358).
BP6
Variant 2-178685560-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178685560-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 46864.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178685560-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178685560-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00427 (651/152284) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0118 (491/41546). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.011. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 319 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.32350C>G p.Leu10784Val missense_variant 128/363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2
LOC124906100XR_007087318.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.2186-28194G>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.32350C>G p.Leu10784Val missense_variant 128/3635 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141 P1
TTN-AS1ENST00000659121.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.503-48944G>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00428
AC:
652
AN:
152164
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0119
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00406
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0153
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000529
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00382
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00207
AC:
515
AN:
248616
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00192
AC XY:
259
AN XY:
134888
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00189
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0171
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00282
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00114
AC:
1672
AN:
1461368
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00115
AC XY:
838
AN XY:
726924
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00195
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0170
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000244
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000440
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00292
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00427
AC:
651
AN:
152284
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00428
AC XY:
319
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00405
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0153
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000529
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00378
Alfa
AF:
0.00216
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00525
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00973
AC:
37
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00134
AC:
11
ExAC
AF:
0.00189
AC:
229
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000867
AC:
3
AN:
3474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:25
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJun 24, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 10, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoSep 02, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 10, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 26, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 06, 2015p.Leu9540Val in exon 125 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 1.2% of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs726 50029). -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2024TTN: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioAug 11, 2016- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 12, 2013This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.54
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.94
Eigen
Benign
-0.78
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.60
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.045
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.42
T;T;.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0039
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.40
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.85
N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.0
.;.;B;B
Vest4
0.24
MVP
0.18
MPC
0.084
ClinPred
0.0030
T
GERP RS
2.0

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs72650029; hg19: chr2-179550287; API