2-178696120-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.30952G>A​(p.Glu10318Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00684 in 1,551,666 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 559 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.034 ( 321 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0039 ( 238 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

6
10

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:26

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.21

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.002067268).
BP6
Variant 2-178696120-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178696120-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 46844.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.114 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.30952G>A p.Glu10318Lys missense_variant Exon 114 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.30952G>A p.Glu10318Lys missense_variant Exon 114 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0336
AC:
5102
AN:
151930
Hom.:
317
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.116
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00634
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000574
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0230
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00775
AC:
1231
AN:
158840
AF XY:
0.00604
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.117
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00561
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00545
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000807
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00493
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00392
AC:
5481
AN:
1399618
Hom.:
238
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00347
AC XY:
2393
AN XY:
690394
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.124
AC:
3922
AN:
31628
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00638
AC:
228
AN:
35716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00710
AC:
179
AN:
25220
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000559
AC:
2
AN:
35796
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000303
AC:
24
AN:
79292
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000203
AC:
1
AN:
49292
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00667
AC:
38
AN:
5696
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000541
AC:
584
AN:
1078978
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00867
AC:
503
AN:
58000
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
325
650
976
1301
1626
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
132
264
396
528
660
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0337
AC:
5125
AN:
152048
Hom.:
321
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0325
AC XY:
2417
AN XY:
74362
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.116
AC:
4833
AN:
41490
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0116
AC:
178
AN:
15284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00634
AC:
22
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000386
AC:
2
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10590
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000574
AC:
39
AN:
67902
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0227
AC:
48
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
230
460
689
919
1149
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
54
108
162
216
270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0125
Hom.:
332
Bravo
AF:
0.0387
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0975
AC:
347
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00114
AC:
9
ExAC
AF:
0.00649
AC:
606
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00779
AC:
28
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:26
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:11
Nov 13, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 24, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Glu9074Lys in exon 111 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 9.6% (276/2864) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/rs73038324). -

Apr 09, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 07, 2022
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Oct 17, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
May 06, 2015
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Mar 02, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 14, 2012
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.17
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.47
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.067
.;.;.;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.32
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.41
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.78
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.85
D;D;.;T;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0021
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.97
T
PhyloP100
1.2
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.51
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.7
N;.;.;.;D
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Uncertain
0.025
D;.;.;.;D
Polyphen
0.33
.;.;B;B;.
Vest4
0.26
MVP
0.28
MPC
0.10
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
5.8
Mutation Taster
=80/20
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs73038324; hg19: chr2-179560847; API