2-178719370-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 1P and 2B. PP2BP4_Moderate
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.24020G>A(p.Arg8007Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000496 in 1,613,742 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.24020G>A | p.Arg8007Gln | missense_variant | 83/363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.24020G>A | p.Arg8007Gln | missense_variant | 83/363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141 | P1 | |
TTN-AS1 | ENST00000659121.1 | n.503-15134C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152086Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000965 AC: 24AN: 248766Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000119 AC XY: 16AN XY: 134930
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000520 AC: 76AN: 1461538Hom.: 1 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000743 AC XY: 54AN XY: 727046
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74406
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 27, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at