2-178731827-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.17048A>G​(p.Tyr5683Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00672 in 1,613,858 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 45 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0047 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0069 ( 42 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

2
2
12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:24

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.16
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007775426).
BP6
Variant 2-178731827-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178731827-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 46621.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=14, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-178731827-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr2-178731827-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00469 (714/152314) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00747 (508/68024). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00693. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 339 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.17048A>G p.Tyr5683Cys missense_variant Exon 58 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.17048A>G p.Tyr5683Cys missense_variant Exon 58 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00469
AC:
714
AN:
152196
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00807
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00352
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00499
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00747
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000958
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00559
AC:
1391
AN:
248668
Hom.:
10
AF XY:
0.00575
AC XY:
775
AN XY:
134874
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00155
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00174
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000111
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00559
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00353
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00816
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00580
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00693
AC:
10125
AN:
1461544
Hom.:
42
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.00700
AC XY:
5092
AN XY:
727052
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00961
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00639
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00397
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00774
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00588
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00469
AC:
714
AN:
152314
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00455
AC XY:
339
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00807
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00352
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00499
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00747
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000948
Alfa
AF:
0.00711
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00471
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00701
AC:
26
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00882
AC:
34
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00225
AC:
9
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00719
AC:
60
ExAC
AF:
0.00585
AC:
707
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00644
EpiControl
AF:
0.00688

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:24
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Mar 16, 2017
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Sep 03, 2020
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Aug 18, 2017
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Tyr4439Cys in exon 55 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 1% (103/10130) of Ashkenazi chromos omes, including 3 homozygotes, by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http: //gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs72648942). -

Aug 27, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: TTN c.13316A>G (p.Tyr4439Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the I-band of the encoded protein sequence. Two of four in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0056 in 248668 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0082 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 13-folds over the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TTN causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.00063), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. Eight ClinVar submissions (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant seven times as likely benign/benign and once as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Aug 06, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:7
May 05, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

TTN: BS2 -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 11, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

TTN-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 19, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Mar 19, 2020
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Brugada syndrome Benign:1
Feb 27, 2018
Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Aug 27, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

General population or subpopulation frequency is too high to be a pathogenic mutation based on disease/syndrome prevalence and penetrance;In silico models in agreement (benign) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.22
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.33
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.23
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.35
Eigen
Benign
-0.68
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.58
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.69
T;T;.;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.076
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0078
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.70
T
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.8
D;.;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.42
Sift
Benign
0.11
T;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.035
.;.;B;B
Vest4
0.36
MVP
0.20
MPC
0.11
ClinPred
0.052
T
GERP RS
3.8

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.10
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs72648942; hg19: chr2-179596554; COSMIC: COSV105213885; COSMIC: COSV105213885; API