2-181604076-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_201548.5(CERKL):ā€‹c.242A>Cā€‹(p.Asp81Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.137 in 1,591,672 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16,562 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.14 ( 1636 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.14 ( 14926 hom. )

Consequence

CERKL
NM_201548.5 missense

Scores

4
14

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.95
Variant links:
Genes affected
CERKL (HGNC:21699): (ceramide kinase like) This gene was initially identified as a locus (RP26) associated with an autosomal recessive form of retinitis pigmentosa (arRP) disease. This gene encodes a protein with ceramide kinase-like domains, however, the protein does not phosphorylate ceramide and its target substrate is currently unknown. This protein may be a negative regulator of apoptosis in photoreceptor cells. Mutations in this gene cause a form of retinitis pigmentosa characterized by autosomal recessive cone and rod dystrophy (arCRD). Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms and non-coding transcripts.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0025988221).
BP6
Variant 2-181604076-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-181604076-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 257150.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-181604076-T-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.245 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CERKLNM_201548.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.242A>C p.Asp81Ala missense_variant 2/13 ENST00000410087.8 NP_963842.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CERKLENST00000410087.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.242A>C p.Asp81Ala missense_variant 2/131 NM_201548.5 ENSP00000386725 P1Q49MI3-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.137
AC:
20814
AN:
151868
Hom.:
1630
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.107
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.177
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0778
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.258
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0624
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.217
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0385
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.136
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.117
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.148
AC:
36349
AN:
245128
Hom.:
3110
AF XY:
0.140
AC XY:
18591
AN XY:
133178
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.106
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.218
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0708
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.250
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0587
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.228
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.133
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.141
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.137
AC:
197234
AN:
1439686
Hom.:
14926
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.134
AC XY:
95816
AN XY:
717346
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0959
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.212
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0715
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.239
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0570
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.230
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.135
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.134
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.137
AC:
20840
AN:
151986
Hom.:
1636
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.142
AC XY:
10572
AN XY:
74298
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.107
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.176
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0778
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.257
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0628
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.217
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.136
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.120
Alfa
AF:
0.128
Hom.:
1498
Bravo
AF:
0.134
TwinsUK
AF:
0.141
AC:
521
ALSPAC
AF:
0.136
AC:
523
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.112
AC:
492
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.128
AC:
1097
ExAC
AF:
0.140
AC:
16937

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 09, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Retinitis pigmentosa 26 Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 10, 2021- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchDept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya UniversityOct 01, 2023- -
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.65
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.043
.;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.35
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.28
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.84
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.71
T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0026
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
L;L;L;L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P;P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.42
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.8
D;D;N;D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.12
Sift
Benign
0.16
T;T;D;T;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.019
D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.78
P;.;P;P;P
Vest4
0.40
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
0.014
T
GERP RS
3.0
Varity_R
0.084
gMVP
0.38

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61750041; hg19: chr2-182468803; COSMIC: COSV59212557; API