2-181604091-A-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_201548.5(CERKL):​c.239-12T>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.11 in 1,577,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19,076 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.23 ( 7598 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.097 ( 11478 hom. )

Consequence

CERKL
NM_201548.5 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001000
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0670

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CERKL (HGNC:21699): (ceramide kinase like) This gene was initially identified as a locus (RP26) associated with an autosomal recessive form of retinitis pigmentosa (arRP) disease. This gene encodes a protein with ceramide kinase-like domains, however, the protein does not phosphorylate ceramide and its target substrate is currently unknown. This protein may be a negative regulator of apoptosis in photoreceptor cells. Mutations in this gene cause a form of retinitis pigmentosa characterized by autosomal recessive cone and rod dystrophy (arCRD). Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms and non-coding transcripts.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]
CERKL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • CERKL-related retinopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • retinitis pigmentosa 26
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 2-181604091-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-181604091-A-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 166848.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.566 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CERKLNM_201548.5 linkc.239-12T>A intron_variant Intron 1 of 12 ENST00000410087.8 NP_963842.1 Q49MI3-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CERKLENST00000410087.8 linkc.239-12T>A intron_variant Intron 1 of 12 1 NM_201548.5 ENSP00000386725.3 Q49MI3-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.231
AC:
35085
AN:
151970
Hom.:
7579
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.573
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0341
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.186
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0764
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.119
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.116
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.120
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.133
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0797
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.189
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.138
AC:
33265
AN:
240622
AF XY:
0.129
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.578
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.189
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0789
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.123
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.115
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0810
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.124
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0969
AC:
138119
AN:
1425026
Hom.:
11478
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.0969
AC XY:
68870
AN XY:
710698
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.588
AC:
18361
AN:
31232
American (AMR)
AF:
0.193
AC:
8529
AN:
44218
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0762
AC:
1969
AN:
25834
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.112
AC:
4405
AN:
39162
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.122
AC:
10362
AN:
85140
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.117
AC:
6136
AN:
52258
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.146
AC:
802
AN:
5508
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0744
AC:
80554
AN:
1082658
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.119
AC:
7001
AN:
59016
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.455
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4612
9224
13835
18447
23059
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
3250
6500
9750
13000
16250
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.231
AC:
35150
AN:
152088
Hom.:
7598
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.230
AC XY:
17095
AN XY:
74354
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.573
AC:
23701
AN:
41398
American (AMR)
AF:
0.187
AC:
2853
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0764
AC:
265
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.119
AC:
615
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.115
AC:
556
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.120
AC:
1273
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.129
AC:
38
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0797
AC:
5422
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.187
AC:
396
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1029
2059
3088
4118
5147
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
308
616
924
1232
1540
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0658
Hom.:
123
Bravo
AF:
0.254
Asia WGS
AF:
0.128
AC:
447
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 29, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Retinitis pigmentosa 26 Benign:3
May 31, 2017
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.92
CADD
Benign
5.3
DANN
Benign
0.40
PhyloP100
-0.067
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00010
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.036
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6433923; hg19: chr2-182468818; API