2-189010695-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000090.4(COL3A1):āc.4059T>Gā(p.His1353Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.999 in 1,614,158 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 805,640 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000090.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL3A1 | NM_000090.4 | c.4059T>G | p.His1353Gln | missense_variant | 50/51 | ENST00000304636.9 | NP_000081.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL3A1 | ENST00000304636.9 | c.4059T>G | p.His1353Gln | missense_variant | 50/51 | 1 | NM_000090.4 | ENSP00000304408.4 | ||
COL3A1 | ENST00000450867.2 | c.3960T>G | p.His1320Gln | missense_variant | 49/50 | 1 | ENSP00000415346.2 | |||
COL3A1 | ENST00000487010.1 | n.1438T>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/3 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.996 AC: 151524AN: 152196Hom.: 75430 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.999 AC: 250991AN: 251310Hom.: 125341 AF XY: 0.999 AC XY: 135669AN XY: 135802
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.999 AC: 1461064AN: 1461844Hom.: 730152 Cov.: 54 AF XY: 1.00 AC XY: 726861AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.996 AC: 151641AN: 152314Hom.: 75488 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.996 AC XY: 74169AN XY: 74472
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Dec 02, 2014 | This is a RefSeq error. The reference base (c.4059T) is the minor allele. This a llele (T) has been identified in 1.5% (66/4406) of African American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs1516446) and thus meets criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 05, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, type 4 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 22, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Oct 03, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 05, 2018 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 30, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Polymicrogyria with or without vascular-type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 22, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at