2-189676771-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001378068.1(ANKAR):āc.281T>Gā(p.Leu94Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00313 in 1,614,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 132 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L94P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001378068.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANKAR | NM_001378068.1 | c.281T>G | p.Leu94Arg | missense_variant | 2/23 | ENST00000684021.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANKAR | ENST00000684021.1 | c.281T>G | p.Leu94Arg | missense_variant | 2/23 | NM_001378068.1 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0162 AC: 2471AN: 152194Hom.: 66 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00410 AC: 1029AN: 251000Hom.: 25 AF XY: 0.00315 AC XY: 427AN XY: 135704
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00176 AC: 2576AN: 1461862Hom.: 65 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00156 AC XY: 1131AN XY: 727226
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0163 AC: 2480AN: 152312Hom.: 67 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0160 AC XY: 1194AN XY: 74500
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at