2-208121716-T-C

Position:

chr2-208121716-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM1BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_006891.4(CRYGD):c.482A>G(p.Asn161Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000477 in 1,613,748 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000048 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CRYGD
NM_006891.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0900

Variant links:

Genes affected

CRYGD (HGNC:2411): (crystallin gamma D) Crystallins are separated into two classes: taxon-specific, or enzyme, and ubiquitous. The latter class constitutes the major proteins of vertebrate eye lens and maintains the transparency and refractive index of the lens. Since lens central fiber cells lose their nuclei during development, these crystallins are made and then retained throughout life, making them extremely stable proteins. Mammalian lens crystallins are divided into alpha, beta, and gamma families; beta and gamma crystallins are also considered as a superfamily. Alpha and beta families are further divided into acidic and basic groups. Seven protein regions exist in crystallins: four homologous motifs, a connecting peptide, and N- and C-terminal extensions. Gamma-crystallins are a homogeneous group of highly symmetrical, monomeric proteins typically lacking connecting peptides and terminal extensions. They are differentially regulated after early development. Four gamma-crystallin genes (gamma-A through gamma-D) and three pseudogenes (gamma-E, gamma-F, gamma-G) are tandemly organized in a genomic segment as a gene cluster. Whether due to aging or mutations in specific genes, gamma-crystallins have been involved in cataract formation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CRYGD links:

LOC100507443 (HGNC:):

LOC100507443 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

PM1

In a chain Gamma-crystallin D (size 172) in uniprot entity CRGD_HUMAN there are 22 pathogenic changes around while only 4 benign (85%) in NM_006891.4

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.09145519).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000046 (7/152214) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000103 (7/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000476. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 7 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CRYGD	NM_006891.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.482A>G	p.Asn161Ser	missense_variant	3/3	ENST00000264376.5	NP_008822.2	P07320A0A140CTX7
LOC100507443	NR_038437.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.97+2491T>C		intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CRYGD	ENST00000264376.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.482A>G	p.Asn161Ser	missense_variant	3/3	1	NM_006891.4	ENSP00000264376.4		P07320

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000398

AC:

AN:

251174

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000295

AC XY:

AN XY:

135770

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000793

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000479

AC:

AN:

1461534

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000591

AC XY:

AN XY:

726992

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000765

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000603

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74352

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000573

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000793

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cataract 4 multiple types

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

CRYGD-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Oct 19, 2022

The CRYGD c.482A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Asn161Ser. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.0078% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/2-208986440-T-C). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Aculeiform cataract

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Aug 30, 2023

In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The serine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 333868). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CRYGD-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (rs760434926, gnomAD 0.008%). This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 161 of the CRYGD protein (p.Asn161Ser). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.066

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.35

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.55

CADD

Benign

5.1

DANN

Benign

0.23

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.11

Eigen

Benign

-1.1

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.1

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.0083

M_CAP

Benign

0.0072

MetaRNN

Benign

0.091

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.97

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.3

PrimateAI

Benign

0.31

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.27

REVEL

Benign

0.037

Sift

Benign

1.0

Sift4G

Benign

1.0

Polyphen

0.0010

Vest4

0.058

MVP

0.47

MPC

0.19

ClinPred

0.072

GERP RS

0.49

Varity_R

0.21

gMVP

0.064

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over