2-208271556-T-C

Position:

chr2-208271556-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_015040.4(PIKFYVE):c.37T>C(p.Ser13Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000161 in 1,614,060 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000016 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

PIKFYVE
NM_015040.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.52

Variant links:

Genes affected

PIKFYVE (HGNC:23785): (phosphoinositide kinase, FYVE-type zinc finger containing) Phosphorylated derivatives of phosphatidylinositol (PtdIns) regulate cytoskeletal functions, membrane trafficking, and receptor signaling by recruiting protein complexes to cell- and endosomal-membranes. Humans have multiple PtdIns proteins that differ by the degree and position of phosphorylation of the inositol ring. This gene encodes an enzyme (PIKfyve; also known as phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate 5-kinase type III or PIPKIII) that phosphorylates the D-5 position in PtdIns and phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PtdIns3P) to make PtdIns5P and PtdIns(3,5)biphosphate. The D-5 position also can be phosphorylated by type I PtdIns4P-5-kinases (PIP5Ks) that are encoded by distinct genes and preferentially phosphorylate D-4 phosphorylated PtdIns. In contrast, PIKfyve preferentially phosphorylates D-3 phosphorylated PtdIns. In addition to being a lipid kinase, PIKfyve also has protein kinase activity. PIKfyve regulates endomembrane homeostasis and plays a role in the biogenesis of endosome carrier vesicles from early endosomes. The protein plays a key role in cell entry of ebola virus and SARS-CoV-2 by endocytosis Mutations in this gene cause corneal fleck dystrophy (CFD); an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by numerous small white flecks present in all layers of the corneal stroma. Histologically, these flecks appear to be keratocytes distended with lipid and mucopolysaccharide filled intracytoplasmic vacuoles. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2021]

PIKFYVE links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PP2

Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, PIKFYVE

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.062354296).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000157 (23/1461856) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.000139 (12/86258). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00008. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 16 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 23 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
PIKFYVE	NM_015040.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.37T>C	p.Ser13Pro	missense_variant	2/42	ENST00000264380.9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
PIKFYVE	ENST00000264380.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.37T>C	p.Ser13Pro	missense_variant	2/42	1	NM_015040.4	P1	Q9Y2I7-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152204

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000318

AC:

AN:

251462

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000589

AC XY:

AN XY:

135906

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000163

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000264

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000157

AC:

AN:

1461856

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000220

AC XY:

AN XY:

727224

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000139

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000989

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152204

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74348

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000302

ExAC

AF:

0.0000494

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Fleck corneal dystrophy

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.24

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.33

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

Eigen

Benign

-0.51

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.35

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.86

LIST_S2

Benign

0.73

T;T;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.0090

MetaRNN

Benign

0.062

T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.6

L;L;L;L;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

N;N;N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.44

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.1

N;N;N;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.15

Sift

Benign

0.089

T;T;T;D;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.31

T;T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;B;.;B;.;B

Vest4

0.10

MutPred

0.064

Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);

MVP

0.52

MPC

0.36

ClinPred

0.060

GERP RS

1.4

Varity_R

0.071

gMVP

0.30

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over