2-21023017-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 1P and 5B. PP3BP6BS2
The NM_000384.3(APOB):c.2630C>T(p.Pro877Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000479 in 1,613,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P877R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000384.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, type BInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- familial hypobetalipoproteinemia 1Inheritance: AR, AD, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen
- homozygous familial hypercholesterolemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000585 AC: 89AN: 152098Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000438 AC: 110AN: 251204 AF XY: 0.000427 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000468 AC: 684AN: 1461880Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000473 AC XY: 344AN XY: 727242 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000585 AC: 89AN: 152098Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000552 AC XY: 41AN XY: 74294 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, type B Uncertain:3
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
The APOB c.2630C>T variant is classified as VUS (BS1) Population frequency too high for APOB with respect to FH (only accounts for 1-5% of FH cases). Conflicting in silico data, no functional evidence. -
- -
Familial hypobetalipoproteinemia 1 Uncertain:2
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. The available evidence on this variant's pathogenicity is insufficient or conflicting. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: PP3. -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
APOB: BP4 -
- -
Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, type B;C4551990:Familial hypobetalipoproteinemia 1 Benign:1
- -
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Benign:1
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at