2-210556738-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_001875.5(CPS1):c.5C>T(p.Thr2Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000949 in 1,611,998 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T2T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001875.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPS1 | NM_001875.5 | c.5C>T | p.Thr2Met | missense_variant | 1/38 | ENST00000233072.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPS1 | ENST00000233072.10 | c.5C>T | p.Thr2Met | missense_variant | 1/38 | 1 | NM_001875.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000191 AC: 29AN: 151676Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000148 AC: 37AN: 250764Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 20AN XY: 135518
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000849 AC: 124AN: 1460322Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000840 AC XY: 61AN XY: 726444
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000191 AC: 29AN: 151676Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000203 AC XY: 15AN XY: 74032
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital hyperammonemia, type I Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 10, 2021 | The c.5C>T (p.T2M) alteration is located in exon 1 (coding exon 1) of the CPS1 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 5, causing the threonine (T) at amino acid position 2 to be replaced by a methionine (M). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 02, 2021 | The majority of missense variants in this gene are considered pathogenic (Stenson et al., 2014); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at