2-218882255-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_025216.3(WNT10A):​c.208C>T​(p.Arg70Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00136 in 1,614,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R70Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

WNT10A
NM_025216.3 missense

Scores

4
8
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.497

Publications

11 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
WNT10A (HGNC:13829): (Wnt family member 10A) The WNT gene family consists of structurally related genes which encode secreted signaling proteins. These proteins have been implicated in oncogenesis and in several developmental processes, including regulation of cell fate and patterning during embryogenesis. This gene is a member of the WNT gene family. It is strongly expressed in the cell lines of promyelocytic leukemia and Burkitt's lymphoma. In addition, it and another family member, the WNT6 gene, are strongly coexpressed in colorectal cancer cell lines. The gene overexpression may play key roles in carcinogenesis through activation of the WNT-beta-catenin-TCF signaling pathway. This gene and the WNT6 gene are clustered in the chromosome 2q35 region. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
WNT10A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • ectodermal dysplasia WNT10A related
    Inheritance: SD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Illumina
  • tooth agenesis, selective, 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • Schöpf-Schulz-Passarge syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • tooth agenesis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • autosomal recessive hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.037638843).
BP6
Variant 2-218882255-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-218882255-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 334394.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00111 (169/152292) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00808 (39/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00608. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 80 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AR,SD,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
WNT10ANM_025216.3 linkc.208C>T p.Arg70Trp missense_variant Exon 2 of 4 ENST00000258411.8 NP_079492.2
WNT10AXM_011511929.3 linkc.112C>T p.Arg38Trp missense_variant Exon 3 of 5 XP_011510231.1
WNT10AXM_011511930.2 linkc.208C>T p.Arg70Trp missense_variant Exon 2 of 3 XP_011510232.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WNT10AENST00000258411.8 linkc.208C>T p.Arg70Trp missense_variant Exon 2 of 4 1 NM_025216.3 ENSP00000258411.3
WNT10AENST00000458582.1 linkc.94C>T p.Arg32Trp missense_variant Exon 1 of 2 3 ENSP00000388812.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00112
AC:
171
AN:
152176
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00849
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000848
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00141
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00177
AC:
444
AN:
251386
AF XY:
0.00206
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000832
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00179
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00139
AC:
2028
AN:
1461882
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00154
AC XY:
1120
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000149
AC:
5
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00107
AC:
48
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00604
AC:
521
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00137
AC:
73
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00416
AC:
24
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00114
AC:
1265
AN:
1112004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00151
AC:
91
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
142
285
427
570
712
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
44
88
132
176
220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00111
AC:
169
AN:
152292
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00107
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000241
AC:
10
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000588
AC:
9
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00808
AC:
39
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000848
AC:
9
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00141
AC:
96
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00237
AC:
5
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9
17
26
34
43
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00134
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000899
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00198
AC:
17
ExAC
AF:
0.00198
AC:
240
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00240
EpiControl
AF:
0.00160

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Aug 01, 2022
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

WNT10A: BS2

Dec 14, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Observed in the heterozygous state in two brothers with tooth agenesis; the more severely affected brother was also heterozygous for an EDARADD variant (PMID: 23991204); Identified in an individual with hypodontia; this individual's mother also harbors the variant and has fully developed dentition (PMID: 35999385); Reported along with a second WNT10A variant in a patient with oligodontia, but familial segregation information was not included (PMID: 24449199); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 34426522, 24449199, 35999385, 23991204)

Schöpf-Schulz-Passarge syndrome Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Jun 08, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

WNT10A-related disorder Uncertain:1
Jan 22, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The WNT10A c.208C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg70Trp. This variant has been reported in the heterozygous state in two brothers with missing permanent teeth, and one of the two brothers has more severe phenotype also carried a truncating variant in the EDARADD gene (Arte et al. 2013. PubMed ID: 23991204). This variant is documented in 0.59% of alleles in individuals of South Asian descent in gnomAD. This variant could be benign. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to insufficient functional and genetic evidence.

Odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia;C1835492:Tooth agenesis, selective, 4 Benign:1
Nov 11, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Tooth agenesis, selective, 4 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.29
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.14
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.020
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.82
D
Eigen
Benign
0.15
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.0065
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.83
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.038
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.32
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.4
M
PhyloP100
0.50
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.75
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.0
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.71
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0040
D
Vest4
0.91
ClinPred
0.067
T
GERP RS
0.68
PromoterAI
0.0038
Neutral
Varity_R
0.70
gMVP
0.87
Mutation Taster
=83/17
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.080
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146460077; hg19: chr2-219746977; COSMIC: COSV51462814; COSMIC: COSV51462814; API