2-218882255-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_025216.3(WNT10A):c.208C>T(p.Arg70Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00136 in 1,614,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 7 hom. )
Consequence
WNT10A
NM_025216.3 missense
NM_025216.3 missense
Scores
4
8
6
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.497
Genes affected
WNT10A (HGNC:13829): (Wnt family member 10A) The WNT gene family consists of structurally related genes which encode secreted signaling proteins. These proteins have been implicated in oncogenesis and in several developmental processes, including regulation of cell fate and patterning during embryogenesis. This gene is a member of the WNT gene family. It is strongly expressed in the cell lines of promyelocytic leukemia and Burkitt's lymphoma. In addition, it and another family member, the WNT6 gene, are strongly coexpressed in colorectal cancer cell lines. The gene overexpression may play key roles in carcinogenesis through activation of the WNT-beta-catenin-TCF signaling pathway. This gene and the WNT6 gene are clustered in the chromosome 2q35 region. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.037638843).
BP6
Variant 2-218882255-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-218882255-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 334394.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}. Variant chr2-218882255-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 SD gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNT10A | NM_025216.3 | c.208C>T | p.Arg70Trp | missense_variant | 2/4 | ENST00000258411.8 | NP_079492.2 | |
WNT10A | XM_011511929.3 | c.112C>T | p.Arg38Trp | missense_variant | 3/5 | XP_011510231.1 | ||
WNT10A | XM_011511930.2 | c.208C>T | p.Arg70Trp | missense_variant | 2/3 | XP_011510232.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNT10A | ENST00000258411.8 | c.208C>T | p.Arg70Trp | missense_variant | 2/4 | 1 | NM_025216.3 | ENSP00000258411 | P1 | |
WNT10A | ENST00000458582.1 | c.97C>T | p.Arg33Trp | missense_variant | 1/2 | 3 | ENSP00000388812 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00112 AC: 171AN: 152176Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
171
AN:
152176
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00177 AC: 444AN: 251386Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00206 AC XY: 280AN XY: 135880
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
444
AN:
251386
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
280
AN XY:
135880
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00139 AC: 2028AN: 1461882Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00154 AC XY: 1120AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2028
AN:
1461882
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1120
AN XY:
727246
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00111 AC: 169AN: 152292Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00107 AC XY: 80AN XY: 74470
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
169
AN:
152292
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
74470
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
17
ExAC
AF:
AC:
240
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2022 | WNT10A: BS2 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 25, 2021 | Observed in the heterozygous state in two brothers with tooth agenesis; the more severely affected brother was also heterozygous for an EDARADD variant (Arte et al., 2013); Reported along with a second WNT10A variant in a patient with oligodontia in the published literature, but familial segregation information was not included (Arzoo et al., 2014); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24449199, 23991204) - |
SchC6pf-Schulz-Passarge syndrome Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Jun 08, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
WNT10A-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 22, 2024 | The WNT10A c.208C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg70Trp. This variant has been reported in the heterozygous state in two brothers with missing permanent teeth, and one of the two brothers has more severe phenotype also carried a truncating variant in the EDARADD gene (Arte et al. 2013. PubMed ID: 23991204). This variant is documented in 0.59% of alleles in individuals of South Asian descent in gnomAD. This variant could be benign. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to insufficient functional and genetic evidence. - |
Odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia;C1835492:Tooth agenesis, selective, 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Tooth agenesis, selective, 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
M
MutationTaster
Benign
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D
Polyphen
D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at