2-218890118-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 2P and 8B. PM1BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_025216.3(WNT10A):c.511C>T(p.Arg171Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00186 in 1,614,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R171H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_025216.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNT10A | NM_025216.3 | c.511C>T | p.Arg171Cys | missense_variant | 3/4 | ENST00000258411.8 | |
WNT10A | XM_011511929.3 | c.415C>T | p.Arg139Cys | missense_variant | 4/5 | ||
WNT10A | XM_011511930.2 | c.377-2656C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNT10A | ENST00000258411.8 | c.511C>T | p.Arg171Cys | missense_variant | 3/4 | 1 | NM_025216.3 | P1 | |
WNT10A | ENST00000458582.1 | c.264-2656C>T | intron_variant | 3 | |||||
WNT10A | ENST00000483911.1 | downstream_gene_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00129 AC: 196AN: 152192Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00191 AC: 480AN: 251268Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00189 AC XY: 257AN XY: 135874
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00192 AC: 2813AN: 1461826Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00194 AC XY: 1409AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00129 AC: 196AN: 152310Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00130 AC XY: 97AN XY: 74482
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 13, 2023 | Case-control studies suggest this variant is associated with tooth agenesis (Song et al., 2014); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28265457, 24312213, 30417976, 28981473, 29367877, 24700731, 31103801, 23167694, 34426522, 33034246, 34593752, 36071541, 35546689, 24043634, 24311251, 33329022, 36755192, 36553094) - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia;C1835492:Tooth agenesis, selective, 4 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | reference population | Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center | Mar 18, 2016 | - - |
Tooth agenesis, selective, 4 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Second Dental Center, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Tooth agenesis, selective, 2 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Stomatology Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University | - | We used whole exome sequencing to compare tooth loss gene loci between two brothers with hypophidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED), analyze the difference of tooth loss phenotype, and explore its mechanism. wes showed that an EDA mutation was found in both older and younger brothers (c.878T>G), and the compound heterozygous mutation of WNT10A (c.511C>T and c.637G>A) Found only in the elder brothers. Prediction of secondary and tertiary structures of the WNT10A variants (p. R171C, p.G213S) indicated the impaired function of the molecule. The elder brothers have a more severe tooth loss phenotype than younger brothers. It has been reported that eda c.878T>G mutation caused HED (PMID: 30526585). We believe that EDA is the main pathogenic gene in the two patients, and the complex heterozygous WNT10A missense mutation can aggravate the HED phenotype caused by EDA mutation, resulting in a severe edentulous mandible phenotype in the elder brother. - |
SchC6pf-Schulz-Passarge syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at