2-219418555-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001927.4(DES):ā€‹c.93T>Cā€‹(p.Ser31Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.969 in 1,604,920 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 758,258 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.88 ( 61082 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.98 ( 697176 hom. )

Consequence

DES
NM_001927.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.70
Variant links:
Genes affected
DES (HGNC:2770): (desmin) This gene encodes a muscle-specific class III intermediate filament. Homopolymers of this protein form a stable intracytoplasmic filamentous network connecting myofibrils to each other and to the plasma membrane. Mutations in this gene are associated with desmin-related myopathy, a familial cardiac and skeletal myopathy (CSM), and with distal myopathies. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 2-219418555-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-219418555-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 36003.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-219418555-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.7 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.982 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
DESNM_001927.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.93T>C p.Ser31Ser synonymous_variant 1/9 ENST00000373960.4 NP_001918.3 P17661Q53SB5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DESENST00000373960.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.93T>C p.Ser31Ser synonymous_variant 1/91 NM_001927.4 ENSP00000363071.3 P17661

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.881
AC:
133900
AN:
152060
Hom.:
61069
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.609
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.999
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.949
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.986
Gnomad EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.976
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.997
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.959
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.988
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.907
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.964
AC:
219435
AN:
227618
Hom.:
106697
AF XY:
0.969
AC XY:
122256
AN XY:
126124
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.593
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.976
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.989
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.974
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.998
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.988
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.976
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.978
AC:
1420620
AN:
1452750
Hom.:
697176
Cov.:
74
AF XY:
0.979
AC XY:
707161
AN XY:
722376
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.601
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.973
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.988
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.974
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.997
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.989
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.962
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.880
AC:
133951
AN:
152170
Hom.:
61082
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.885
AC XY:
65811
AN XY:
74400
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.609
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.949
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.986
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.976
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.997
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.988
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.908
Alfa
AF:
0.969
Hom.:
18405
Bravo
AF:
0.867
Asia WGS
AF:
0.962
AC:
3335
AN:
3470

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJul 20, 2011- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 15, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 25, 2012This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 02, 2016- -
Desmin-related myofibrillar myopathy Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 30, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1I Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 30, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Neurogenic scapuloperoneal syndrome, Kaeser type Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 30, 2021- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 12, 2017- -
Myofibrillar Myopathy, Dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 18, 2011- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 11, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.83

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2017800; hg19: chr2-220283277; COSMIC: COSV64660277; COSMIC: COSV64660277; API