2-219420154-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001927.4(DES):​c.638C>T​(p.Ala213Val) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0141 in 1,614,216 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 233 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A213A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0099 ( 12 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.015 ( 221 hom. )

Consequence

DES
NM_001927.4 missense, splice_region

Scores

1
8
9
Splicing: ADA: 0.05342
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:1B:22O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.51
Variant links:
Genes affected
DES (HGNC:2770): (desmin) This gene encodes a muscle-specific class III intermediate filament. Homopolymers of this protein form a stable intracytoplasmic filamentous network connecting myofibrils to each other and to the plasma membrane. Mutations in this gene are associated with desmin-related myopathy, a familial cardiac and skeletal myopathy (CSM), and with distal myopathies. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013873875).
BP6
Variant 2-219420154-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-219420154-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 44265.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=10, not_provided=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-219420154-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-219420154-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr2-219420154-C-T is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic]. Variant chr2-219420154-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00989 (1506/152346) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0158 (1077/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.015. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 663 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 12 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
DESNM_001927.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.638C>T p.Ala213Val missense_variant, splice_region_variant 2/9 ENST00000373960.4 NP_001918.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DESENST00000373960.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.638C>T p.Ala213Val missense_variant, splice_region_variant 2/91 NM_001927.4 ENSP00000363071 P1
DESENST00000477226.6 linkuse as main transcriptn.112C>T splice_region_variant, non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/84
DESENST00000492726.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.33C>T splice_region_variant, non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/64

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00989
AC:
1505
AN:
152228
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00321
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0230
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00942
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00904
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00716
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00921
AC:
2315
AN:
251474
Hom.:
24
AF XY:
0.00996
AC XY:
1354
AN XY:
135908
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00332
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00575
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00340
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00734
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0152
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00896
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0146
AC:
21307
AN:
1461870
Hom.:
221
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.0142
AC XY:
10361
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00263
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00617
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00345
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00889
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0174
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0130
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00989
AC:
1506
AN:
152346
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00890
AC XY:
663
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00320
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00934
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00331
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00904
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00709
Alfa
AF:
0.0136
Hom.:
36
Bravo
AF:
0.00963
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0151
AC:
56
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0174
AC:
67
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00431
AC:
19
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0137
AC:
118
ExAC
AF:
0.0101
AC:
1232
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0154
EpiControl
AF:
0.0149

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1Benign:22Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJan 10, 2012Ala213Val in exon 2 of DES: This variant has been reported by several studies an d was initially thought to be disease causing (Goldfarb 2004, Bar 2004, Kostarev a 2006). However, it has been identified in 0.4% (8/2000) of chromosomes from a broad, though clinically and racially unspecified population (dbSNP rs41272699) and in 1.5% (102/7020) of European American chromosomes and 0.4% (14/3738) of Af rican American chromosomes by the NHBLI Exome sequencing project in a clinical c ohort that included individuals with heart disease (http://evs.gs.washington.edu /EVS). With a frequency this high the variant is considered to be benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJun 24, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 04, 2013- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsAug 01, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 03, 2018Variant summary: DES c.638C>T (p.Ala213Val) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Intermediate filament, rod domain of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0094 in 278984 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 375 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DES causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.638C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy as well as in controls. In one study, the variant failed to segregate with disease in a family, being found in 4 healthy individuals and was absent in 1 affected individual (Taylor_2007). In functional studies, cells expressing the variant showed normal complete filamentous network (Bar_2005, Goudeau_2006). Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:5Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 33232181, 32105824, 22215463, 25736269, 17325244, 23861362, 20474083, 27618136, 22260945, 16865695, 21842594, 25617006, 23168288) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 26, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyEpithelial Biology; Institute of Medical Biology, Singapore-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Desmin-related myofibrillar myopathy Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics, Royal Melbourne HospitalMar 30, 2023European (non-Finnish) population allele frequency is 1.5% (rs41272699, 1,953/129,178 alleles, 20 homozygotes in gnomAD v2.1). Based on the classification scheme RMH ACMG Guidelines v1.1.1, this variant is classified as Benign. Following criteria met: BA1 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Myofibrillar myopathy Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingWellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Newcastle UniversityAug 16, 2016- -
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchLupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of MedicineMar 03, 2015It is unclear whether these changes, alone or in aggregate, are contributing to the development of CDH in this family. -
Myofibrillar Myopathy, Dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1I Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Neurogenic scapuloperoneal syndrome, Kaeser type Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMar 15, 2023- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 15, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.26
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.32
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.22
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.46
T
Eigen
Benign
0.17
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.18
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.92
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.014
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.0041
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L
MutationTaster
Benign
0.98
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.63
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.3
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.36
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0080
D
Polyphen
0.90
P
Vest4
0.59
MPC
0.011
ClinPred
0.017
T
GERP RS
3.7
Varity_R
0.40
gMVP
0.62

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.053
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.30
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41272699; hg19: chr2-220284876; COSMIC: COSV99059323; COSMIC: COSV99059323; API