2-222201889-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_181458.4(PAX3):​c.1420+55C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000499 in 1,613,846 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00051 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

PAX3
NM_181458.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.334

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PAX3 (HGNC:8617): (paired box 3) This gene is a member of the paired box (PAX) family of transcription factors. Members of the PAX family typically contain a paired box domain and a paired-type homeodomain. These genes play critical roles during fetal development. Mutations in paired box gene 3 are associated with Waardenburg syndrome, craniofacial-deafness-hand syndrome, and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. The translocation t(2;13)(q35;q14), which represents a fusion between PAX3 and the forkhead gene, is a frequent finding in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Alternative splicing results in transcripts encoding isoforms with different C-termini. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
PAX3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • craniofacial-deafness-hand syndrome
    Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Waardenburg syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Waardenburg syndrome type 1
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Waardenburg syndrome type 3
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 2-222201889-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-222201889-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 334556.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000368 (56/152116) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00146 (7/4808). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000683. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 25 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AR,AD,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PAX3NM_181458.4 linkc.1420+55C>T intron_variant Intron 8 of 8 ENST00000392070.7 NP_852123.1 P23760-7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PAX3ENST00000392070.7 linkc.1420+55C>T intron_variant Intron 8 of 8 1 NM_181458.4 ENSP00000375922.3 P23760-7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000368
AC:
56
AN:
152016
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000524
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000500
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000561
AC:
141
AN:
251164
AF XY:
0.000633
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000617
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000434
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000475
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000490
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000513
AC:
750
AN:
1461730
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.000579
AC XY:
421
AN XY:
727156
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000896
AC:
3
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000604
AC:
27
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39670
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00209
AC:
180
AN:
86230
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000187
AC:
1
AN:
53400
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00365
AC:
21
AN:
5758
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000424
AC:
471
AN:
1111956
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000778
AC:
47
AN:
60384
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
39
79
118
158
197
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000368
AC:
56
AN:
152116
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000336
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
74366
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000145
AC:
6
AN:
41508
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000524
AC:
8
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00146
AC:
7
AN:
4808
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10548
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00342
AC:
1
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000500
AC:
34
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
5
8
10
13
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000214
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000321

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Craniofacial-deafness-hand syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Waardenburg syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.67
PhyloP100
0.33
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs186207055; hg19: chr2-223066608; API