2-222202200-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_181458.4(PAX3):​c.1174-10G>C variant causes a splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.129 in 1,566,748 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14,235 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.12 ( 1207 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.13 ( 13028 hom. )

Consequence

PAX3
NM_181458.4 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001188
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.14
Variant links:
Genes affected
PAX3 (HGNC:8617): (paired box 3) This gene is a member of the paired box (PAX) family of transcription factors. Members of the PAX family typically contain a paired box domain and a paired-type homeodomain. These genes play critical roles during fetal development. Mutations in paired box gene 3 are associated with Waardenburg syndrome, craniofacial-deafness-hand syndrome, and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. The translocation t(2;13)(q35;q14), which represents a fusion between PAX3 and the forkhead gene, is a frequent finding in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Alternative splicing results in transcripts encoding isoforms with different C-termini. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
Variant 2-222202200-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-222202200-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 226998.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.139 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PAX3NM_181458.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1174-10G>C splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant ENST00000392070.7 NP_852123.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PAX3ENST00000392070.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1174-10G>C splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_181458.4 ENSP00000375922 A1P23760-7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.116
AC:
17619
AN:
152038
Hom.:
1208
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0795
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0614
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.145
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.188
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0334
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.118
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.155
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.142
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.151
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.108
AC:
20972
AN:
194398
Hom.:
1403
AF XY:
0.106
AC XY:
10948
AN XY:
103678
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0738
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0928
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.195
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000280
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0379
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.116
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.145
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.144
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.130
AC:
184477
AN:
1414592
Hom.:
13028
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.128
AC XY:
89666
AN XY:
701240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0809
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0977
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.192
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000158
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0372
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.115
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.144
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.133
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.116
AC:
17609
AN:
152156
Hom.:
1207
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.114
AC XY:
8505
AN XY:
74372
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0792
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.145
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.188
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0332
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.118
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.142
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.149
Alfa
AF:
0.0940
Hom.:
182
Bravo
AF:
0.117
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0250
AC:
88
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 03, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineNov 24, 20141174-10G>C in intron 7C of PAX3: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 14.6% (1259/8598) of European Amer ican chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project ( http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2855268). -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Craniofacial-deafness-hand syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Waardenburg syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.70

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00012
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2855268; hg19: chr2-223066919; API