2-233760973-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 3P and 1B. PM5PP5BP4
The NM_000463.3(UGT1A1):c.686C>T(p.Pro229Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000458 in 1,614,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P229Q) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000463.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGT1A1 | NM_000463.3 | c.686C>T | p.Pro229Leu | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 5 | ENST00000305208.10 | NP_000454.1 | |
UGT1A4 | NM_007120.3 | c.868-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | ENST00000373409.8 | NP_009051.1 | ||
UGT1A5 | NM_019078.2 | c.868-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | ENST00000373414.4 | NP_061951.1 | ||
UGT1A3 | NM_019093.4 | c.868-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | ENST00000482026.6 | NP_061966.1 | ||
UGT1A6 | NM_001072.4 | c.862-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | ENST00000305139.11 | NP_001063.2 | ||
UGT1A10 | NM_019075.4 | c.856-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | ENST00000344644.10 | NP_061948.1 | ||
UGT1A8 | NM_019076.5 | c.856-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | ENST00000373450.5 | NP_061949.3 | ||
UGT1A7 | NM_019077.3 | c.856-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | ENST00000373426.4 | NP_061950.2 | ||
UGT1A9 | NM_021027.3 | c.856-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | ENST00000354728.5 | NP_066307.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGT1A1 | ENST00000305208.10 | c.686C>T | p.Pro229Leu | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 5 | 1 | NM_000463.3 | ENSP00000304845.5 | ||
UGT1A4 | ENST00000373409.8 | c.868-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | 1 | NM_007120.3 | ENSP00000362508.4 | |||
UGT1A5 | ENST00000373414.4 | c.868-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | 1 | NM_019078.2 | ENSP00000362513.3 | |||
UGT1A3 | ENST00000482026.6 | c.868-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | 1 | NM_019093.4 | ENSP00000418532.1 | |||
UGT1A6 | ENST00000305139.11 | c.862-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | 1 | NM_001072.4 | ENSP00000303174.6 | |||
UGT1A10 | ENST00000344644.10 | c.856-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | 1 | NM_019075.4 | ENSP00000343838.5 | |||
UGT1A9 | ENST00000354728.5 | c.856-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | 1 | NM_021027.3 | ENSP00000346768.4 | |||
UGT1A7 | ENST00000373426.4 | c.856-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | 1 | NM_019077.3 | ENSP00000362525.3 | |||
UGT1A8 | ENST00000373450.5 | c.856-6061C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 4 | 1 | NM_019076.5 | ENSP00000362549.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000438 AC: 11AN: 251388Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000368 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135886
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000445 AC: 65AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000426 AC XY: 31AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74346
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
The UGT1A1 c.686C>T; p.Pro229Leu variant (rs35350960) is reported in the literature healthy individuals (Abuli 2016, Kaniwa 2005), but functional analyses of this variant demonstrate poor UGT1A1 protein stability, lowered glucuronidation activity, and the variant is predicted to cause Irinotecan toxicity and hyperbilirubinemia (Kaniwa 2005). This variant is found in the non-Finnish European population with an allele frequency of 0.01% (10/129,092 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database (v2.1.1). Additionally, another variant at this codon (c.686C>A, p.Pro229Gln, also known as *27), classified as pathogenic-mild, has been reported in individuals with Gilbert syndrome with reduced penetrance (Aono 1995, Gagne 2002, Koiwai 1995, Sun 2017), and may confer an increased risk for drug toxicity when treated with irinotecan (Ando 2000, Teh 2012). Based on available information, the p.Pro229Leu variant is considered to be likely pathogenic-mild for Gilbert syndrome with possible reduced penetrance. Although it is possible that the pharmacogenetic impact of this variant can be similar to that of the p.Pro229Gln variant, additional clinical evidence is warranted to confirm such association. References: -
Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt UGT1A1 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 1409267). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with UGT1A1-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (rs35350960, gnomAD 0.008%). This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 229 of the UGT1A1 protein (p.Pro229Leu). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 1;C0017551:Gilbert syndrome;C0270210:Lucey-Driscoll syndrome;C1866173:Bilirubin, serum level of, quantitative trait locus 1;C2931132:Crigler-Najjar syndrome, type II Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at