2-237334732-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_004369.4(COL6A3):c.9123G>A(p.Thr3041Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0348 in 1,614,024 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,123 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.026 ( 64 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.036 ( 1059 hom. )
Consequence
COL6A3
NM_004369.4 synonymous
NM_004369.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.79
Genes affected
COL6A3 (HGNC:2213): (collagen type VI alpha 3 chain) This gene encodes the alpha-3 chain, one of the three alpha chains of type VI collagen, a beaded filament collagen found in most connective tissues. The alpha-3 chain of type VI collagen is much larger than the alpha-1 and -2 chains. This difference in size is largely due to an increase in the number of subdomains, similar to von Willebrand Factor type A domains, that are found in the amino terminal globular domain of all the alpha chains. These domains have been shown to bind extracellular matrix proteins, an interaction that explains the importance of this collagen in organizing matrix components. Mutations in the type VI collagen genes are associated with Bethlem myopathy, a rare autosomal dominant proximal myopathy with early childhood onset. Mutations in this gene are also a cause of Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy, also referred to as Ullrich scleroatonic muscular dystrophy, an autosomal recessive congenital myopathy that is more severe than Bethlem myopathy. Multiple transcript variants have been identified, but the full-length nature of only some of these variants has been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 2-237334732-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-237334732-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 95016.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-237334732-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-237334732-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.79 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0263 (4005/152184) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0393 (2672/68008). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.038. There are 64 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1980 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 64 SD gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL6A3 | NM_004369.4 | c.9123G>A | p.Thr3041Thr | synonymous_variant | 41/44 | ENST00000295550.9 | NP_004360.2 | |
COL6A3 | NM_057167.4 | c.8505G>A | p.Thr2835Thr | synonymous_variant | 40/43 | NP_476508.2 | ||
COL6A3 | NM_057166.5 | c.7302G>A | p.Thr2434Thr | synonymous_variant | 38/41 | NP_476507.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL6A3 | ENST00000295550.9 | c.9123G>A | p.Thr3041Thr | synonymous_variant | 41/44 | 1 | NM_004369.4 | ENSP00000295550.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0263 AC: 4003AN: 152066Hom.: 63 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
4003
AN:
152066
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0260 AC: 6537AN: 251438Hom.: 114 AF XY: 0.0260 AC XY: 3536AN XY: 135894
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
6537
AN:
251438
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3536
AN XY:
135894
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0356 AC: 52083AN: 1461840Hom.: 1059 Cov.: 60 AF XY: 0.0349 AC XY: 25359AN XY: 727226
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
52083
AN:
1461840
Hom.:
Cov.:
60
AF XY:
AC XY:
25359
AN XY:
727226
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0263 AC: 4005AN: 152184Hom.: 64 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0266 AC XY: 1980AN XY: 74410
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
4005
AN:
152184
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1980
AN XY:
74410
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 02, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Dec 12, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Collagen 6-related myopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Bethlem myopathy 1A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at