2-237353378-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004369.4(COL6A3):c.6653C>T(p.Pro2218Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0383 in 1,613,906 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,181 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004369.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL6A3 | NM_004369.4 | c.6653C>T | p.Pro2218Leu | missense_variant | 25/44 | ENST00000295550.9 | NP_004360.2 | |
COL6A3 | NM_057167.4 | c.6035C>T | p.Pro2012Leu | missense_variant | 24/43 | NP_476508.2 | ||
COL6A3 | NM_057166.5 | c.4832C>T | p.Pro1611Leu | missense_variant | 22/41 | NP_476507.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL6A3 | ENST00000295550.9 | c.6653C>T | p.Pro2218Leu | missense_variant | 25/44 | 1 | NM_004369.4 | ENSP00000295550.4 | ||
COL6A3 | ENST00000472056.5 | c.4832C>T | p.Pro1611Leu | missense_variant | 22/41 | 1 | ENSP00000418285.1 | |||
COL6A3 | ENST00000353578.9 | c.6035C>T | p.Pro2012Leu | missense_variant | 24/43 | 5 | ENSP00000315873.4 | |||
COL6A3 | ENST00000491769.1 | n.907C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/20 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0719 AC: 10936AN: 152076Hom.: 713 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0418 AC: 10515AN: 251404Hom.: 482 AF XY: 0.0396 AC XY: 5378AN XY: 135872
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0348 AC: 50855AN: 1461712Hom.: 1468 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0346 AC XY: 25136AN XY: 727194
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0719 AC: 10948AN: 152194Hom.: 713 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0688 AC XY: 5123AN XY: 74412
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 17, 2012 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 15, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 31, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 17, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Bethlem myopathy 1A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Collagen 6-related myopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at