2-240868892-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000030.3(AGXT):c.27C>G(p.Thr9=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000031 in 1,612,924 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T9T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000030.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGXT | NM_000030.3 | c.27C>G | p.Thr9= | synonymous_variant | 1/11 | ENST00000307503.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGXT | ENST00000307503.4 | c.27C>G | p.Thr9= | synonymous_variant | 1/11 | 1 | NM_000030.3 | P1 | |
AGXT | ENST00000472436.1 | n.47C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/5 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000530 AC: 13AN: 245414Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000824 AC XY: 11AN XY: 133454
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 48AN: 1460614Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000482 AC XY: 35AN XY: 726562
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152310Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74476
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Primary hyperoxaluria, type I Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 20, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at