2-26184779-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001168241.2(GAREM2):c.931G>A(p.Ala311Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000253 in 1,500,044 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001168241.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAREM2 | ENST00000401533.7 | c.931G>A | p.Ala311Thr | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 6 | 1 | NM_001168241.2 | ENSP00000384593.1 | ||
GAREM2 | ENST00000407684.1 | c.700G>A | p.Ala234Thr | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 6 | 2 | ENSP00000384581.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151928Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000208 AC: 2AN: 96324 AF XY: 0.0000371 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000267 AC: 36AN: 1348116Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000196 AC XY: 13AN XY: 663930 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151928Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74212 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.931G>A (p.A311T) alteration is located in exon 4 (coding exon 4) of the GAREM2 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 931, causing the alanine (A) at amino acid position 311 to be replaced by a threonine (T). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at