2-26461897-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PM5
The NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.5332G>A(p.Val1778Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000242 in 1,614,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1778F) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_194248.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTOF | ENST00000272371.7 | c.5332G>A | p.Val1778Ile | missense_variant | Exon 43 of 47 | 1 | NM_194248.3 | ENSP00000272371.2 | ||
| OTOF | ENST00000339598.8 | c.3031G>A | p.Val1011Ile | missense_variant | Exon 26 of 29 | 1 | NM_194323.3 | ENSP00000344521.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251478 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000260 AC: 38AN: 1461892Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000261 AC XY: 19AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74306 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at