2-26464028-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_194248.3(OTOF):​c.5039G>A​(p.Arg1680His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000571 in 1,613,702 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1680C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0031 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

OTOF
NM_194248.3 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.38

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
OTOF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010392129).
BP6
Variant 2-26464028-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-26464028-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 178627.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00311 (474/152312) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0108 (447/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00993. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 219 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
OTOFNM_194248.3 linkc.5039G>A p.Arg1680His missense_variant Exon 40 of 47 ENST00000272371.7 NP_919224.1 Q9HC10-1
OTOFNM_194323.3 linkc.2738G>A p.Arg913His missense_variant Exon 23 of 29 ENST00000339598.8 NP_919304.1 Q9HC10-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
OTOFENST00000272371.7 linkc.5039G>A p.Arg1680His missense_variant Exon 40 of 47 1 NM_194248.3 ENSP00000272371.2 Q9HC10-1
OTOFENST00000339598.8 linkc.2738G>A p.Arg913His missense_variant Exon 23 of 29 1 NM_194323.3 ENSP00000344521.3 Q9HC10-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00312
AC:
475
AN:
152194
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000854
AC:
214
AN:
250618
AF XY:
0.000605
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000839
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000307
AC:
448
AN:
1461390
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000241
AC XY:
175
AN XY:
727004
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0108
AC:
363
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000872
AC:
39
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
2
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52954
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000144
AC:
16
AN:
1111992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000447
AC:
27
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
27
54
82
109
136
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00311
AC:
474
AN:
152312
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00294
AC XY:
219
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0108
AC:
447
AN:
41572
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00137
AC:
21
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
2
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.489
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
24
48
71
95
119
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00129
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00380
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00772
AC:
34
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00119
AC:
144
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Sep 29, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

OTOF: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

Nov 11, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1
May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Arg1680His in Exon 40 of OTOF: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 0.7% (25/3738) of African American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs11893228). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.077
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.41
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.36
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.19
.;.;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.45
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.34
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.59
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.93
D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.010
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.79
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.46
.;.;.;N;N;.
PhyloP100
1.4
PrimateAI
Benign
0.45
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.2
N;N;.;N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.15
Sift
Benign
0.13
T;T;.;T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T;T;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.0020
B;B;.;B;.;B
Vest4
0.12
MVP
0.77
MPC
0.19
ClinPred
0.028
T
GERP RS
2.5
Varity_R
0.042
gMVP
0.46
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11893228; hg19: chr2-26686896; COSMIC: COSV109416756; API