2-26464907-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_194248.3(OTOF):​c.4922G>A​(p.Arg1641His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000482 in 1,597,470 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000048 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

OTOF
NM_194248.3 missense

Scores

8
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.14
Variant links:
Genes affected
OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.03976506).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000477 (69/1445212) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00124 (54/43424). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000979. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 27 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
OTOFNM_194248.3 linkc.4922G>A p.Arg1641His missense_variant Exon 39 of 47 ENST00000272371.7 NP_919224.1 Q9HC10-1
OTOFNM_194323.3 linkc.2621G>A p.Arg874His missense_variant Exon 22 of 29 ENST00000339598.8 NP_919304.1 Q9HC10-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
OTOFENST00000272371.7 linkc.4922G>A p.Arg1641His missense_variant Exon 39 of 47 1 NM_194248.3 ENSP00000272371.2 Q9HC10-1
OTOFENST00000339598.8 linkc.2621G>A p.Arg874His missense_variant Exon 22 of 29 1 NM_194323.3 ENSP00000344521.3 Q9HC10-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000592
AC:
9
AN:
152140
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000203
AC:
49
AN:
240798
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000169
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
130274
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00149
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000906
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000477
AC:
69
AN:
1445212
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000376
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
718118
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000136
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000525
AC:
8
AN:
152258
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000403
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74438
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000174
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000793
ExAC
AF:
0.000181
AC:
22
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Jun 25, 2024
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Feb 01, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1
Apr 04, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The Arg1641His vari ant in OTOF has been previously identified two Hispanic individuals with hearing loss and one affected sibling by our laboratory However, none of these individu als carried a second variant in the OTOF gene. In addition, the Arg1641His varia nt been identified in 0.8% (1/128) of Mexican chromosomes by the 1000Genomes pro ject (dbSNP rs200283244). Computational prediction tools and conservation analys es suggest that the Arg1641His variant may not impact the protein, though this i nformation is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. Of note, two mamm als, walrus and panda, also carry a histidine (His) at this position. In summary , the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty; however, based upon the absence of a second OTOF variant in affected individual s, its presence in the general population, and the lack of conservation at the A rg1641 position, we would lean towards a more likely benign role. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.076
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.051
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.12
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.46
.;.;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
0.081
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.20
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.82
T;T;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.022
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.040
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.78
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
.;.;.;M;M;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.50
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D;D;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.26
Sift
Benign
0.049
D;D;.;T;T;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.035
D;T;.;D;D;.
Polyphen
0.53
P;B;.;B;.;B
Vest4
0.38
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.20
ClinPred
0.18
T
GERP RS
4.9
Varity_R
0.21
gMVP
0.61

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200283244; hg19: chr2-26687775; COSMIC: COSV55516687; API