2-26470698-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_194248.3(OTOF):​c.3918G>C​(p.Lys1306Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000254 in 1,613,746 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000027 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

OTOF
NM_194248.3 missense

Scores

1
3
15

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.36
Variant links:
Genes affected
OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.20217007).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000267 (39/1461430) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00468 (27/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0033. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 15 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
OTOFNM_194248.3 linkc.3918G>C p.Lys1306Asn missense_variant Exon 32 of 47 ENST00000272371.7 NP_919224.1 Q9HC10-1
OTOFNM_194323.3 linkc.1617G>C p.Lys539Asn missense_variant Exon 15 of 29 ENST00000339598.8 NP_919304.1 Q9HC10-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
OTOFENST00000272371.7 linkc.3918G>C p.Lys1306Asn missense_variant Exon 32 of 47 1 NM_194248.3 ENSP00000272371.2 Q9HC10-1
OTOFENST00000339598.8 linkc.1617G>C p.Lys539Asn missense_variant Exon 15 of 29 1 NM_194323.3 ENSP00000344521.3 Q9HC10-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152198
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000280
AC:
7
AN:
249936
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000148
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135220
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000444
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000267
AC:
39
AN:
1461430
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000206
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
727006
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000132
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152316
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000868
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000151
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9 Uncertain:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jun 08, 2020
Baylor Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -

not specified Uncertain:1
May 18, 2018
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.Lys1306Asn variant in OTOF has been previously identified by our laborator y in 1 individual with hearing loss, who also had a pathogenic variant in a diff erent gene that was sufficient to explain the hearing loss. This variant has bee n identified in 4/110706 of European chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Datab ase (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs774929350), and has been reported in ClinVar (Variant ID:229077). Although this variant has been seen in the general population, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogeni c role. Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that th is variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, the clinical significance of the p.Lys1306Asn variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP criteria applied: BP4, PM2_Supportin g. -

OTOF-related disorder Uncertain:1
Mar 21, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The OTOF c.3918G>C variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Lys1306Asn. This variant has been observed in heterozygous state in patient with non-syndromic hearing loss (Table S2, Almontashiri et al. 2018. PMID: 29048421). An alternative substitution at the same amino acid position (p.Lys1306Thr) has been observed in compound heterozygous state in an individual with hearing loss, however this individual had also two compound heterozygous variant in gene CDH23 (Table 1, Adeyemo et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 34837038). This variant is reported in 0.0044% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

not provided Uncertain:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.55
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.099
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.17
.;.;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
0.066
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.21
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.75
T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.040
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.20
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.29
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
.;.;.;L;L;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.53
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.3
N;N;.;N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.23
Sift
Benign
0.37
T;T;.;T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.085
T;T;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.28
B;B;.;B;.;B
Vest4
0.52
MutPred
0.28
.;.;.;Loss of methylation at K1306 (P = 0.0097);Loss of methylation at K1306 (P = 0.0097);.;
MVP
0.88
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
0.083
T
GERP RS
5.5
Varity_R
0.17
gMVP
0.38

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs774929350; hg19: chr2-26693566; API