2-26475997-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 3P and 2B. PM2PP3BP4BP6
The NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.2908C>T(p.Arg970Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000797 in 1,612,670 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00077 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00080 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
OTOF
NM_194248.3 missense
NM_194248.3 missense
Scores
12
5
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.64
Genes affected
OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 9: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Dann, Eigen, MutationAssessor, PrimateAI, PROVEAN, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.38723248).
BP6
Variant 2-26475997-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-26475997-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 48209.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=2}.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOF | NM_194248.3 | c.2908C>T | p.Arg970Cys | missense_variant | 24/47 | ENST00000272371.7 | NP_919224.1 | |
OTOF | NM_194323.3 | c.667C>T | p.Arg223Cys | missense_variant | 7/29 | ENST00000339598.8 | NP_919304.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOF | ENST00000272371.7 | c.2908C>T | p.Arg970Cys | missense_variant | 24/47 | 1 | NM_194248.3 | ENSP00000272371.2 | ||
OTOF | ENST00000339598.8 | c.667C>T | p.Arg223Cys | missense_variant | 7/29 | 1 | NM_194323.3 | ENSP00000344521.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000776 AC: 118AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
118
AN:
152148
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000463 AC: 115AN: 248190Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000475 AC XY: 64AN XY: 134830
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
115
AN:
248190
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
134830
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000799 AC: 1167AN: 1460404Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000741 AC XY: 538AN XY: 726486
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1167
AN:
1460404
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
538
AN XY:
726486
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000775 AC: 118AN: 152266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000792 AC XY: 59AN XY: 74452
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
118
AN:
152266
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
74452
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
9
ExAC
AF:
AC:
53
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 12, 2024 | Observed in a patient with sensorineural hearing loss in published literature (PMID: 20146813); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20146813) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 30, 2024 | Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) Polyphen and MutationTaster predict this amino acid change may be damaging to the protein. - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 23, 2022 | Variant summary: OTOF c.2908C>T (p.Arg970Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the C2 domain (IPR000008) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00078 in 152148 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0026 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD v3 database (genomes data). The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in OTOF causing Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss And Deafness, Type 9 phenotype (0.0011), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. c.2908C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with sensorineural hearing loss (Kothiyal_2010), however this report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss And Deafness, Type 9. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: two have classified the variant as of uncertain significance and one as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Sep 12, 2011 | Arg970Cys in exon 24 of OTOF: This variant has been identified in 0.1% (4/4422) of control chromosomes (rs140613217). This variant has also been identified in o ur laboratory in 0.5% (2/339) probands neither of which had a second OTOF varian t. In summary, this data suggests this variant is likely benign. - |
OTOF-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 21, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
.;.;.;D;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
.;.;.;H;H;.
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D;D;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Pathogenic
D;D;.;D;D;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D;D;.;D;D;.
Polyphen
D;D;.;D;.;D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.77
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at