2-27582298-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_032266.5(SPATA31H1):c.15938G>A(p.Arg5313His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,474 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R5313L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032266.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_032266.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPATA31H1 | NM_032266.5 | MANE Select | c.15938G>A | p.Arg5313His | missense | Exon 5 of 5 | NP_115642.4 | C9JG08 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPATA31H1 | ENST00000447166.3 | TSL:3 MANE Select | c.15938G>A | p.Arg5313His | missense | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000403181.2 | C9JG08 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000401 AC: 1AN: 249362 AF XY: 0.00000739 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461474Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727040 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at