2-28412111-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_005253.4(FOSL2):c.644C>G(p.Ser215Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000206 in 1,453,912 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S215L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005253.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- aplasia cutis-enamel dysplasia syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005253.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOSL2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.644C>G | p.Ser215Trp | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000264716.4 | P15408-1 | ||
| FOSL2 | TSL:1 | c.620C>G | p.Ser207Trp | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000368939.1 | P15408-2 | ||
| FOSL2 | c.695C>G | p.Ser232Trp | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000572852.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000166 AC: 4AN: 241218 AF XY: 0.0000152 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000206 AC: 3AN: 1453912Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000276 AC XY: 2AN XY: 723392 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at