2-29062240-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_001029883.3(PCARE):c.*2629G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0151 in 152,294 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 53 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 53 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
PCARE
NM_001029883.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_001029883.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.121
Genes affected
PCARE (HGNC:34383): (photoreceptor cilium actin regulator) The protein encoded by this gene is highly expressed in photoreceptors and may associate with the primary cilium of the outer segment. The encoded protein appears to undergo post-translational lipid modification. Nonsense and missense variants of this gene appear to cause a recessive form of retinitis pigmentosa. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 2-29062240-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-29062240-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 897595.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0151 (2304/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0462 (1920/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0445. There are 53 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1134 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 53 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCARE | NM_001029883.3 | c.*2629G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000331664.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCARE | ENST00000331664.6 | c.*2629G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 2/2 | 2 | NM_001029883.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0151 AC: 2300AN: 152176Hom.: 53 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2300
AN:
152176
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 110Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 78
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
110
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
78
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0151 AC: 2304AN: 152294Hom.: 53 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0152 AC XY: 1134AN XY: 74490
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2304
AN:
152294
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
1134
AN XY:
74490
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Oct 12, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at